Constitutionalism under Extreme Conditions: Law, Emergency, Exception
In: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice Ser. v.82
Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Introduction: Modern Pressures on Constitutionalism -- Emergency, Exception, and Normalcy -- Introduction: Emergency, Exception and Normalcy -- References -- From Institutional Sovereignty to Constitutional Mindset: Rethinking the Domestication of the State of Exception in the Age of Normalization -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Under the Wings of Sovereignty: Liberal Answers to the Challenges from the State of Exception -- 2.1 Managing Distinction: Law and Politics Under Normative Duality -- 2.2 Sovereignty Reified: Institutional Dominance and the Constitutionalization of the State of Exception -- 3 From Constitutional Control to Legal Management: Broken Liberal Promises in the Age of Normalization -- 4 Beyond Control: Judgment, Constitutional Mindset, and the Domestication of the State of Exception -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Judicial Review and Emergencies in Post-Marcos Philippines -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Marcos and Martial Law -- 3 The Laws of Emergency -- 4 Cases Under the 1987 Constitution -- 4.1 Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora, G.R. No. 141284, August 15, 2000 -- 4.2 Lacson v. Perez, G.R. No. 147780, May 10, 2001 -- 4.3 Sanlakas v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 159085, February 3, 2004 -- 4.4 David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, May 3, 2006 -- 4.5 Ampatuan v. Puno, G.R. No. 190259, June 7, 2011 -- 4.6 Fortun v. Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 190293, March 20, 2012 -- 5 Analysis -- 6 Conclusion -- References -- Constitution and Law as Instruments for Normalising Abnormalcy: States of Exception in the Plurinational Context -- 1 Introduction -- 2 A Normative Understanding of States of Exceptions in Plurinational Contexts -- 3 Case Study: Sri Lanka -- 3.1 Centralisation of Powers and the State of Exception -- 3.2 National Security Laws and the State of Exception -- 4 The Indian Experience.