Suchergebnisse

The U.S. v. Microsoft case was filed in 1998, the District Court filed its opinion in 2000, and the D.C. Circuit's opinion came down in 2001. This article explains why the case continues to stand as an important Sherman Act, Section 2 monopolization case. Moreover, if restated and reviewed as a two-sided market case in light of Ohio v. Am. Express Co., the outline would be unchanged.

Oliver Williamson's advocacy of a greater role for economists pretrial was prescient. This article explains the value of such pretrial intervention (in aligning incentives and encouraging settlement) from law and economics perspectives, and advocates greater use of court-appointed economic experts. The article also offers a brief critical commentary on Williamson's views with respect to predation.

Oliver Williamson's advocacy of a greater role for economists pretrial was prescient. This article explains the value of such pretrial intervention (in aligning incentives and encouraging settlement) from law and economics perspectives, and advocates greater use of court-appointed economic experts. The article also offers a brief critical commentary on Williamson's views with respect to predation.

This article serves as an introduction to a symposium that was organized with the goal of ex plicating, discussing, and evaluating the validity of the most important statistical and demo graphic issues that have been raised in voting rights cases. The article outlines, discusses, and evaluates the issues surrounding a recent voting rights case in Los Angeles, Garza v. County of Los Angeles.