Suchergebnisse

Verlagsinfo: Anhand einer rechtsvergleichenden Bestandsaufnahme (Deutschland, USA, Österreich, Italien, Frankreich und Slowakische Republik) untersucht diese Arbeit aus der Sicht des deutschen Rechts die Problemstellungen des Bildnisschutzes in unterschiedlichen nationalen Ausprägungen. Im nationalen und internationalen Wirkungsbereich der Medien, der kommerziellen Verwertung von Bildmaterial in Presse und Werbung begegnen uns ständig Fragen den Bildnisschutz betreffend. Als Ausprägung des Persönlichkeitsschutzes befindet sich der Bildnisschutz im andauernden Spannungsverhältnis zu den Medien. Zum einen werden in dieser Arbeit historische Entwicklungen des Bildnisschutzes erörtert, auch um aktuelle Streitstände besser verständlich zu machen; zum anderen werden einschlägige Gerichtsentscheidungen in den verschiedenen Rechtsordnungen erläutert und rechtsvergleichend untersucht. In diesem Zusammenhang werden die im jeweiligen Recht geltenden Rechtsfolgen bei Persönlichkeitsverletzungen des «Rechts am eigenen Bild» anhand aktueller Rechtsprechung rechtsvergleichend dargestellt und auf ihre Effektivität (z.B. Umfang von Schadensersatzbeträgen) überprüft.

Against the backdrop of the need for an increase in energy efficiency and a decrease in energy and resource utilisation, and for an economy that utilises fewer fossil raw materials and that relies more on renewable, environmentally friendly and natural resources, this publication gathers articles in the field of national and international policies and regulations concerning biofuels with a focus on southern Africa. Highlevel interdisciplinary research and topics of research include among others the science base for bioenergy and the presentation of examples of best practice. The finite nature of fossil raw materials and the necessity of climate protection call for a worldwide reform of energy and resource policies to promote the utilisation of renewable, natural resources. In this light, this publication makes a significant contribution with the intention to foster the dialogue on biofuels in southern Africa and beyond.With contributions by:Ryan Blanchard, Tjaša Bole-Rentel, Alan C Brent, Eddie G Cross, Johann F Görgens, Manisha Gulati, Chengetai E Hamadziripi, Johann H Krige, Sabrina Kumschick, Renata A Marcheti, Vincent Musewe, Antonio D Padula, Lena C Plato, David M Richardson, Oliver C Ruppel, Louise Scholtz and Willem H van Zyl

In a world grappling with unprecedented challenges, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 2015, to be achieved by 2030, stand as a beacon of hope, envisioning a future where prosperity, equity, and environmental sustainability coalesce. As the outcome of the 2023 SDG New York Summit (18-19 September) showed, the path to achieving these ambitious goals remains uneven, with persistent gaps in poverty eradication, climate action, and other critical areas. While legal frameworks, such as national development plans and international treaties, play a role, integrating the SDGs into the very foundation of governance –the constitution –offers a potentially powerful solution. Elevating the SDGs to constitutional principles grants them binding legal force, making governments accountable for their implementation. Additionally, integrating human rights and environmental protection principles embedded within the SDGs strengthens existing constitutional guarantees and opens avenues for legal challenges against unsustainable policies. Domestic policies must align with these 'constitutionalised goals', leading to a more holistic approach to sustainable development.

Abstract
Natural resources are the foundation for all life on earth, which all living creatures depend on to exist. Thus, it is subject to many sorts of laws and policies. Globally, constitutions follow different approaches to dealing with their respective country's natural resources, which are rooted in the diverging cultures, political, economic, and legal systems, as well as in the distinct historical developments of the diverse constitutional orders. Accordingly, the present contribution discusses the prominent similarities between the inclusion of provisions relating to ownership, exploitation and exploration, and the use of, natural resources, be they renewable or non-renewable, but also notes the different perspectives adopted and methods of protection applied in the analysed countries' constitutions. The countries discussed in this paper are South Africa and Chad; Brazil, Cuba, and Bolivia; India and Iran; Germany; and Australia. This paper begins by, firstly, defining 'natural resources' and delineating its overlapping concepts. Secondly, the framework for comparison of the analysed countries is set out. Thirdly, the countries selected are separately discussed. Lastly, the comparative analysis is presented with a few concluding observations.

The decision-makers, lawyers and legislators have a responsibility to know and understand the science, facts, global regulatory framework and uncertainties of climate change in order to better achieve the goals of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the 2015 Paris Agreement as well as the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), among others. They also have linkages and relevance for the implementation of the legal obligations under Article 6 (inherent right to life) of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Articles 11 (adequate standard of living) and 12 (physical and mental health) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). This study critically examines the complex interplay between different regimes regarding climate change adaptation and mitigation, sustainability and human rights so as to better respond to "climate emergency" underscored by the UN Secretary-General on 2 June 2022 at the Stockholm+50 Conference.