Inter-agency Information Sharing in Health and Social Care Services: The Role of Professional Culture
In: The British journal of social work, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 657-669
ISSN: 1468-263X
108 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The British journal of social work, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 657-669
ISSN: 1468-263X
In: Journal of bioterrorism & biodefense: JBTBD, Band 1, Heft 1
ISSN: 2157-2526
The philosopher Henry Richardson's short book is a defense of a position on a neglected topic in medical research ethics. Clinical research ethics has been a longstanding area of study, dating back to the aftermath of the Nazi death-camp doctors and the Tuskegee syphilis study. Most ethical regulations and institutions (such as Institutiional Review Boards) have developed in response to those past abuses, including the stress on obtaining informed consent from the subject. Richardson points out that that these ethical regulations do not address one of the key dilemmas faced by medical researchers -- whether or not they have obligations towards subjects who need care not directly related to the purpose of the study, termed "ancillary care obligations.".
In: Oxford political theory
In: Cambridge studies in philosophy
In: Ethics & human research: E&HR : a publication of the Hastings Center, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 2-14
ISSN: 2578-2363
ABSTRACTDiscussion of medical researcher teams' ancillary‐care obligations has long been dominated by partial‐entrustment theory, developed in 2004 by the author of this article, in collaboration with Leah Belsky. Critics of the limited scope of the special ancillary‐care obligations defended by that theory, however, argue that a better theory would take fuller account of the relationship that develops between individual research participants and members of the research team. Nate W. Olson and Thaddeus Metz have each put forward well worked‐out versions of such a relationship‐based account of ancillary‐care obligations. This article critically evaluates these accounts, concluding that while each of them is vulnerable to various criticisms, each also crucially facilitates understanding of this relationship: Olson brings out well how research participants can find that role not just beneficial but also deeply meaningful, and Metz, drawing on African ethical traditions, emphasizes that when things go well, participants are involved as partners in the research effort. Yet the article closes by arguing that the partial‐entrustment theory, surprisingly, can take on board each of these lessons. As so enhanced, it may actually be the best available relationship‐based theory of this subject.
In: Journal of social philosophy, Band 50, Heft 4, S. 642-663
ISSN: 1467-9833
In: Journal of human development and capabilities: a multi-disciplinary journal for people-centered development, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 357-361
ISSN: 1945-2837
In: Signs: journal of women in culture and society, Band 43, Heft 1, S. 29-52
ISSN: 1545-6943
In: Journal of human development and capabilities: a multi-disciplinary journal for people-centered development, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 161-172
ISSN: 1945-2837
In: Ethics & international affairs, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 483-486
ISSN: 1747-7093
In: Signs: journal of women in culture and society, Band 37, Heft 4, S. 909-933
ISSN: 1545-6943
In: Signs: journal of women in culture and society, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 755-760
ISSN: 1545-6943