Suchergebnisse

Health issue is one of national priority issue in Brunei in recent decades. Sultan of Brunei formed the seriousness of the health accord with the realization of the national development agenda Health Promotion Blueprint 2011-2015 and the Brunei Vision 2035. This paper is aims to answer the question why Brunei ratified the WHO Convention on Tobacco Control. This paper is an explanatory with qualitative approach. Data collection method in this research is through library with secondary data sources. All data are taken from books, journals, internet articles and other relevant data to the research. By using the theory of the rational actor model of decision making and the concept of health security, this research shows the policy taken by the Sultan of Brunei is a form of the Health Security of Government to the citizens. Sultan of Brunei ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control because of health issue is including in national development agenda. Various efforts to create Brunei Darussalam as a free smoke state in 2025 have been realized. The evidence of the successes policy of Brunei Government related to tobacco control shown by activities of imported tobacco is significantly decreased and also decreasing the number of smokers in Brunei in 2011. It was also offset by the increasing level of public health in Brunei and the achievement of some of WHO health targets as the Millennium Development Goals.

This paper aims to explain the influence of British Exit (Brexit) on the UK government's policy on immigrants. The results of the referendum on June 23, 2016, show that more than fifty two percent of Britons choose to leave the EU. The UK's exit from EU membership affects some of the policies of the British government, in particular, the policy on immigrants. However for immigrants, the new policy to be implemented by the British government is considered as a threat. This article uses the theory of policy making and the concept of immigration with qualitative research method in the form of literature study. This paper shows that the impact of Brexit on the UK government's policy on immigrants is the discourse of limiting the number and selection of immigrants that will affect both British and immigrant communities. ; Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh British Exit (Brexit) terhadap kebijakan pemerintah Inggris terkait imigran. Hasil referendum pada 23 Juni 2016 menunjukkan bahwa lebih dari lima puluh dua persen penduduk Inggris memilih untuk keluar dari Uni Eropa. Keluarnya Inggris dari keanggotaan Uni Eropa mempengaruhi beberapa kebijakan pemerintahan Inggris, khususnya kebijakan mengenai imigran. Namun bagi imigran, kebijakan baru yang akan diterapkan oleh pemerintahan Inggris merupakan suatu ancaman. Artikel ini menggunakan teori pengambilan kebijakan dan konsep imigrasi dengan metode penelitian kualitatif dalam bentuk studi kepustakaan. Tulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh yang ditimbulkan oleh Brexit terhadap kebijakan pemerintah Inggris terkait imigran adalah adanya wacana pembatasan jumlah dan seleksi imigran yang akan berdampak bagi masyarakat Inggris maupun imigran.

Since Bozizé led the CAR from March 15, 2003, to March 24, 2013, there has been resistance from some of the rebel forces. The rebellion continues because of the economic and political weaknesses in the CAR government. One of them comes from an opposition coalition known as Séléka who staged a rebellion in 2013 with the aim of overthrowing the Bozizé regime. After the fall of Bozizé, CAR's condition has worsened because Séléka rebels have committed gross human rights violations in the CAR. This is where the conflict develops from the conflict that was originally just a conflict of government-opposition, then widened and turned to religious conflicts. As a result, questions arise about the efforts and involvement of third parties in conflict resolution within the CAR and the social impacts of the conflict. This article attempts to answer questions which focuses on the involvement of third parties as peacekeepers in conflict areas. In this case, the authors use qualitative research methods in the form of literature studies such as books, journals, and scientific articles in supporting the final explanation. The result of this paper shows that the failure of Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA) as a peacekeeping force in the conflict in CAR in 2013-2015 is caused by human rights violation in the form of sexual exploitation. This has had a social impact on the lives of communities, especially women and children, suffer from physical and mental trauma resulting from conflict and become victims of human rights violations committed by MINUSCA.

Indonesian football turns to be a "colosseum" of yearly political conflict among political "gladiators". The government aware that according to the history, there is a closeness between football and politics. The government also aware that football can be used as a soft power to stay existed on the international stage. The problem is, the international football federation prohibit the intervention of the government and give a punishment in the shape of suspension for the violators. This paper used a case study method to explain the phenomenon. The government choose using a political figure to indirectly resolute the conflict and govern the football. The military-political figure tends to have suitable characteristics to help the government. However, the political figure has a personal political ambition. It is reasonable in Indonesia.