The strategic interests of expanding the political and economic zone of Russia's influence is expressed by the conceptual approach in advancing its strategy in the APR. This approach became known as the idea of a "Greater Eurasian partnership". The authors analyses the role of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam involvement in the Russian Federation initiative to form the "Greater Eurasian Partnership". The authors also make an attempt to summarize the practical experience of economic and political initiatives interfacing. In this regard they reviewing the countries of the EAEC, ASEAN, SCO and BRICS, along with a number of the other associations and organizations of the Eurasia and APR. ; Стратегические интересы расширения политического и экономического влияния России, концептуальным подходом в продвижении ее стратегии в АТР становится идея «Большого евразийского партнерства». В статье рассматривается вопросы участия СРВ в инициативе РФ по формированию БЕП. Также анализируется роль Вьетнама и российско-вьетнамских отношений в контексте меняющихся геоэкономических и геополитических условий в регионе Евразии. Обобщается практический опыт сопряжения экономико-политических инициатив стран ЕАЭС, АСЕАН, ШОС, БРИКС и ряда других объединений и организаций региона Евразии и АТР.
This article covers the development of public diplomacy in the United States on the Greek track: its formation and implementation through various programs. The aim of the paper is to trace the development of various forms of public diplomacy in order to study the evolution of policy on the part of the US leadership in the fields of public communications and diplomacy.
The article analyzes the confrontation between the United States and China in the Asia-Pacific region, which could lead to the transformation of the global and regional architecture of international relations and weaken the transatlantic partnership of the United States and the European Union in the region. The study identifies the main factors, primarily economic, affecting the balance of power in the region. The attempt of the USA to preserve and strengthen its influence in the region by creating military-political bloc in order to exert pressure on China is highlighted. The article also examines Russia's foreign policy interests in the Asia-Pacific region, in the context of its interaction with Vietnam.
The article is devoted to the peculiarities of military diplomacy as an instrument of China's foreign policy aimed at achieving the goal of the "great revival of the Chinese nation." A special role is given to the process of conceptualization of military diplomacy in the foreign policy discourse of the People's Republic of China (PRC), which allowed the authors to identify the tasks and forms of this means of implementing foreign policy. The close connection of military diplomacy with ensuring the fundamental interests of the People's Republic of China is noted. A special place is given to the region of Southeast Asia, where the PRC has unresolved disputes over maritime rights and national jurisdiction of offshore facilities and mineral deposits with several states. The authors assess the effectiveness of military diplomacy in bilateral relations with the countries of the region. The theoretical foundation of the work is the neorealist approach, which allows us to evaluate military diplomacy as a set of non-forceful measures aimed at achieving national interests. The authors conclude that the country and regional priorities in China's military-diplomatic cooperation seem to correspond to the priorities of China's broader foreign policy. The PRC's intensive use of military diplomacy in the South China Sea demonstrates China's growing leadership potential on the world stage and world-building ideas in neighboring regions.
The article discusses the features and main approaches of Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East. Particular attention is paid to the history of the development of Turkish-American relations. The causes of the contradictions between Turkey and the United States on the security issues of the Middle East region are analyzed. At the same time, the commonality of the approaches of both countries in countering radical terrorism in the territories adjacent to Turkey is noted. The article also discusses the priority areas of Turkish foreign policy, new approaches and technologies in the first decade of the XXI century.
The article reviews Soviet and East German studies of neocolonialism that have been translated into Russian. A total of more than 60 monographs on Western neocolonialism have been systematically studied and finally compiled into an electronic archive in preparation for this publication. Based on the materials of Soviet studies, the article presents the main features of Western neocolonialism, related both to political manoeuvres and the economic arsenal of the former metropolitan powers. A detailed analysis of the narratives used by Western countries to emphasize their proximity to the "Third World" is given. Particular attention is paid to neocolonial theories, both "variants of well-known bourgeois and reformist concepts addressed to developing countries" and "concepts and theories specially created to support neocolonialism." Neocolonial approaches were studied both in the context of individual Western countries and groups of states (Great Britain, France, Germany, the European Economic Community (EEC), USA) and by functional areas (technical assistance, food neocolonialism, international organizations). Regarding the UK, the differences in neocolonial policy between Labor Party and Conservatives are examined. The main instruments of France's neocolonial policy are described and it is concluded that they have hardly changed in recent decades. The role of the FRG in the strategy of "European neocolonialism" is shown, and major characteristics of the neocolonial policy of the EEC are highlighted. With regard to the, authors speak of a new type of imperialist colonialism associated with American leadership in the institutions of the "collective West." As for the United States, a new type of imperialist colonialism is being put forward, associated with America's leadership in the institutions of the "collective West." The origins and "running-in" of the US neocolonial tools are shown in detail, using the actual American colonial experience in the Philippines as an example. The main directions of critical analysis of the participation of Western countries in technical and food aid systems and in the activities of international organizations are presented. In conclusion, some remarks are formulated on the practical component of Soviet studies of neocolonialism. It is also stressed that in the mid-1980s, after the proclamation of the "New Political Thinking" the critical degree of Soviet studies of neocolonialism declined significantly.