Search results

Cet article porte sur le classement des revues instauré par l'Agence de l'évaluation de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur (AERES). Il en examine les finalités, les modalités et les conséquences sur l'organisation du champ scientifique. En analysant les procédures de l'AERES qui mettent en avant une approche quantitative de l'évaluation, il montre que le but est de rendre plus facilement exploitables les résultats de l'évaluation par des organes de gestion administratif et politique, donc de confisquer l'autonomie des institutions universitaires au profit d'un pilotage de la recherche et de l'enseignement supérieur par des instances qui leur sont extérieures.

This article aims at demonstrating that the reception of Diderot in Germany did not take place in a uniform manner but, rather, adapted itself to the socio-cultural specificities of the Empire. His works were, in fact, received into two distinct spaces, here referred to as the learned space and the theatrical space. The first, which was concerned with Diderot's works considered as «philosophical», was sustained by scholars, and was introduced into the university towns of North and Central Protestant Germany. The second, which focused on the reception of his dramatic works, was impelled by actors and theater administrators, and was rooted in the princely capitals throughout the Empire. This article examines the distinctive features of these two spaces and analyzes how their functioning and the practices of their representatives affected the particular reception of Diderot's work.