Suchergebnisse

Over the last decades, climate science has evolved rapidly across multiple expert domains. Our best tools to capture state-of-the-art knowledge in an internally self-consistent modeling framework are the increasingly complex fully coupled Earth System Models (ESMs). However, computational limitations and the structural rigidity of ESMs mean that the full range of uncertainties across multiple domains are difficult to capture with ESMs alone. The tools of choice are instead more computationally efficient reduced complexity models (RCMs), which are structurally flexible and can span the response dynamics across a range of domain-specific models and ESM experiments. Here we present Phase 2 of the Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP Phase 2), the first comprehensive intercomparison of RCMs that are probabilistically calibrated with key benchmark ranges from specialized research communities. Unsurprisingly, but crucially, we find that models which have been constrained to reflect the key benchmarks better reflect the key benchmarks. Under the low-emissions SSP1-1.9 scenario, across the RCMs, median peak warming projections range from 1.3 to 1.7°C (relative to 1850–1900, using an observationally based historical warming estimate of 0.8°C between 1850–1900 and 1995–2014). Further developing methodologies to constrain these projection uncertainties seems paramount given the international community's goal to contain warming to below 1.5°C above preindustrial in the long-term. Our findings suggest that users of RCMs should carefully evaluate their RCM, specifically its skill against key benchmarks and consider the need to include projections benchmarks either from ESM results or other assessments to reduce divergence in future projections. ; ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes CE170100023 United States Department of Energy (DOE) Aparece en contenido como:U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, research in MultiSector Dynamics, Earth and Environmental System Modeling Program NERC/IIASA Collaborative Research Fellowship NE/T009381/1 Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU), Grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan JPMXD0717935457 U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Climate Indicators and Data Products for Future National Climate Assessments program NX16AG34G European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme 820829 ; Versión publicada - versión final del editor

30 pags., 11 figs., 5 tabs. ; We quantify the stratospheric injection of brominated very short-lived substances (VSLS) based on aircraft observations acquired in winter 2014 above the Tropical Western Pacific during the CONvective TRansport of Active Species in the Tropics (CONTRAST) and the Airborne Tropical TRopopause EXperiment (ATTREX) campaigns. The overall contribution of VSLS to stratospheric bromine was determined to be 5.0 ± 2.1 ppt, in agreement with the 5 ± 3 ppt estimate provided in the 2014 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Ozone Assessment report (WMO 2014), but with lower uncertainty. Measurements of organic bromine compounds, including VSLS, were analyzed using CFC-11 as a reference stratospheric tracer. From this analysis, 2.9 ± 0.6 ppt of bromine enters the stratosphere via organic source gas injection of VSLS. This value is two times the mean bromine content of VSLS measured at the tropical tropopause, for regions outside of the Tropical Western Pacific, summarized in WMO 2014. A photochemical box model, constrained to CONTRAST observations, was used to estimate inorganic bromine from measurements of BrO collected by two instruments. The analysis indicates that 2.1 ± 2.1 ppt of bromine enters the stratosphere via inorganic product gas injection. We also examine the representation of brominated VSLS within 14 global models that participated in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative. The representation of stratospheric bromine in these models generally lies within the range of our empirical estimate. Models that include explicit representations of VSLS compare better with bromine observations in the lower stratosphere than models that utilize longer-lived chemicals as a surrogate for VSLS. ; The CONTRAST field deployment was supported by the U.S. NSF, and the ATTREX field deployment was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). P. A. W., R. J. S., T. P. C., J. M. N., and D. C. A. received support from NSF, NASA Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program (ACMAP), and the NASA Modeling, Analysis, and Prediction (MAP). D. C. A. also received support from the NASA Upper Atmospheric Research Program. J. M. N. was also supported by the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, administered by Universities Space Research Association under contract with NASA. R. V. acknowledges funding from NSF awards AGS‐1261740 and AGS‐1620530. CONTRAST data are publicly available at "http://data.eol.ucar.edu/master_list/?project= CONTRAST." ATTREX data are publicly available at "https://espoarchive.nasa.gov/archive/browse/attrex/id4/GHawk." The National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) meteorological data are available at "https://doi.org/10.5065/D6M043C6." CCMI outputs from CESM1‐WACCM and CESM1‐CAM4Chem are archived by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) at "www.earthsystemgrid.org," and NCAR is sponsored by NSF. CCMI output from the EMAC‐L90MA‐SD simulation is available at "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1204495." All other CCMI simulations are archived by the British Atmospheric Data Centre at "http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/". Output from CAM‐chem‐SD is available as "NCAR/ACD CAMChem 1 Degree Forecast" at "http://catalog.eol.ucar.edu/contrast/model/CAMChem_NCAR_1deg/." WACCM and CAM‐Chem are components of the Community Earth System Model (CESM), which is also supported by NSF. Computing resources were provided by NCAR's Climate Simulation Laboratory, sponsored by NSF and other agencies. This research was enabled by the computational and storage resources of NCAR's Computational and Information System Laboratory (CISL). R. S. and K. A. S., with ACCESS‐CCM, acknowledge support from Australian Research Council's Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (CE110001028), the Australian Government's National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme (q90), and Australian Antarctic science grant program (FoRCES 4012). CCSRNIES research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (2‐1303 and 2‐1709) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and computations were performed on NEC‐SX9/A(ECO) computers at the CGER, NIES. The EMAC simulations have been performed at the German Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ) through support from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). DKRZ and its scientific steering committee are gratefully acknowledged for providing the HPC and data archiving resources for the consortial project ESCiMo (Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling). The TOMCAT modeling was supported by NERC NCAS and the SISLAC project (NE/R001782/1), and the simulations were performed on the Archer and Leeds HPC Systems.