Suchergebnisse
Filter
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Natural wealth accounts: a proposal for alleviating the natural resource curse
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 34, Heft 7, S. 1153-1170
ISSN: 0305-750X
World Affairs Online
Natural wealth accounts: A proposal for alleviating the natural resource curse
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 34, Heft 7, S. 1153-1170
On Dworkin's brute-luck–option-luck distinction and the consistency of brute-luck egalitarianism
In: Politics, philosophy & economics: ppe, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 283-312
ISSN: 1741-3060
Egalitarian thinkers have adopted Ronald Dworkin's distinction between brute and option luck in their attempts to construct theories that better respect our intuitions about what it is that egalitarian justice should equalize. I argue that when there is no risk-free choice available, it is less straightforward than commonly assumed to draw this distinction in a way that makes brute-luck egalitarianism plausible. I propose an extension of the brute-luck–option-luck distinction to this more general case. The generalized distinction, called the 'least risky prospect view' of brute luck, implies more redistribution than Dworkin's own solution (although less than called for by some of his other critics). Moreover, the generalized brute-luck–option-luck distinction must be parasitical on an underlying non-egalitarian theory of which sets of options are reasonable. The presupposed prior theory may be inimical to the claim that justice requires equality rather than some other distributive pattern.
The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 58, Heft 4, S. 583-622
ISSN: 1086-3338
Despite a widespread trend toward the adoption of increasingly participatory approaches to political decision making in developing countries, there is little or no evidence that these practices in fact return the benefits attributed to them. This article investigates one specific worry—that participatory decision-making processes may be vulnerable to manipulation by elites. The authors report on a field experiment, drawing on a unique nationwide experiment in democratic deliberation in São Tomé and Príncipe in which the discussion leaders were randomly assigned across meetings. The randomization procedure provides a rare opportunity to identify the impact of leaders on the outcomes of group deliberations. They find that leader effects were extremely large, in many cases accounting for over one-third of all variation in the outcomes of the national discussions. These results have important implications for the design of such deliberative practices. While the total effect of leadership cannot be assessed, it may still be possible to observe when leader influence occurs and to correct for leader effects in comparisons of outcomes across deliberations.
The role of leaders in democratic deliberations: results from a field experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 58, Heft 4, S. 583-622
ISSN: 0043-8871
World Affairs Online