Suchergebnisse
Filter
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
שני תלמידי חכמים שהיו בעירנוTwo Learned Scholars Among Us
In: עיוני משפט כה 189 (2001) 25 Tel-Aviv U. L. Rev.189 (2001)
SSRN
הסדרים ראשוניים Nondelegation
In: עיוני משפט כרך לב 5 /Iyuney Mishpat - Tel-Aviv university law review 2010
SSRN
Constitutional Revolutions: Israel as a Case-Study
In: International Journal of Law in Context, 5,4 pp. 355–378 (2009) Cambridge University Press
SSRN
Book Review: Alexander Yakobson and Amnon Rubinstein – Israel and the Family of Nations
In: 11 Democratic Culture 295 (2007)
SSRN
שלושה מודלים של חוקה Three Models of Constitutionalism
In: משפטים לז תשס"ז 349 37 Hebrew University Law Review 349 (2007)
SSRN
How Should a Court Deal with a Primary Question That the Legislator Seeks to Avoid? The Israeli Controversy over Who is a Jew as an Illustration
In: 39 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1233 (2006)
SSRN
Can an Orthodox Jew Participate in the Public Life of the State of Israel?
In: 20 Shofar 85 (2002)
SSRN
Law or Politics: Israeli Constitutional Adjudication As a Case Study
In: 6 UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 169 2001
SSRN
Law or Politics: Israeli Constitutional Adjudication as a Case Study
In: 6 UCLA J. of Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 169 (2001)
SSRN
Religion and State - A Fresh Theoretical Start
In: 75 Notre Dame L. Rev. 579 (1999)
SSRN
Religion and State in Israel: The Case for Reevaluation and Constitutional Entrenchment
In: 22 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 617 (1999)
SSRN
State and religion in Israel: a philosophical-legal inquiry
State and Religion in Israel begins with a philosophical analysis of the two main questions regarding the role of religion in liberal states: should such states institute a 'Wall of Separation' between state and religion? Should they offer religious practices and religious communities special protection? Gideon Sapir and Daniel Statman argue that liberalism in not committed to Separation, but is committed to granting religion a unique protection, albeit a narrower one than often assumed. They then use Israel as a case study for their conclusions. Although Israel is defined as a Jewish state, its Jewish identity need not be interpreted religiously, requiring that it subjects itself to the dictates of Jewish law (Halakha). The authors test this view by critically examining important topics relevant to state and religion in Israel: marriage and divorce, the drafting of yeshiva students into the army, the character of the Sabbath and more.
In The Wake Of The Immanuel Affair: Would It Not Be Better For Religion To Detach Itself From The State?
In: 15 Democratic Culture 217 (2013) (With Daniel Statman), 2021
SSRN
The Protection of Holy Places
In: Law & ethics of human rights, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 135-155
ISSN: 1938-2545
Abstract
Holy places are protected by the law, but the rationale for this protection has received little attention. The purpose of our paper is to fill this gap. The natural explanation for this protection lies in terms of religious freedom. However, since this freedom is violated only when believers are required to actively act against the dictates of their religion, this notion is of no help in the present context. Even when holy places serve as sites for worship, there is usually no religious duty to carry out worship there. Another explanation would base the protection of holy places on the prohibition against hurting religious feelings. But while this looks promising when the desecration is intentional, it is less so when the desecration or the hurt are incidental. Finally, the protection of holy places is sometimes understood as a way of preserving "cultural heritage." But many holy sites do not fall under this definition and still enjoy protection. Our tentative conclusion is that holy places do not enjoy automatic protection just because they are perceived as such by some religious group. This protection must be earned by arguments that would establish the ("objective") holiness of the relevant site within some religious tradition, explain the exact nature of the harm or offense that is the matter of concern, and demonstrate why the believers' interests regarding the perceived holy place override those of the public.