Suchergebnisse

The article analyzes the non-appearance before the International Court of Justice motivated by the turbulent reception by the Colombian Government of the 2012 and 2016 sentences of the I.C.J in the cases between Nicaragua and Colombia, with the objective of establishing the consequences of such conduct. Methodologically, the jurisprudence that has applied Article 53 of the Statute, and the different consequences of nonappearance in cases before the Court are studied. Through an analysis of jurisprudence the document discusses the nature of non-appearance, its effects on the sentence, the agents, the applicable law, the evidence and the procedure, to conclude that, although non-appearance is a behavior allowed to the State Parties, it is in general detrimental to its procedural interests, its defense of the case and the administration of international justice as a system, especially in such technical cases as those related to maritime delimitation and liability in relation to alleged violations of sovereign rights and maritime spaces. © 2017 Universidad de Caldas.

El presente artículo analiza la no comparecencia ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia, motivado por la turbulenta recepción del gobierno colombiano de las sentencias de 2012 y 2016 de la C.I.J en los casos entre Nicaragua y Colombia, con el objetivo de establecer las consecuencias de tal conducta. Metodológicamente, se estudia la jurisprudencia que ha aplicado el artículo 53 del Estatuto y las distintas consecuencias de la no comparecencia en los casos ante la Corte. Mediante un análisis de jurisprudencia, el documento discute la naturaleza de la no comparecencia, sus efectos en la sentencia, los agentes, el derecho aplicable, la evidencia y el procedimiento, para concluir que, aunque sea no comparecer sea un comportamiento permitido a los Estados Partes, es en general, perjudicial para sus intereses procesales, su defensa del caso y la administración de la justicia internacional como sistema, especialmente en casos tan técnicos como los relativos a delimitación marítima y responsabilidad en materia de alegadas violaciones a derechos soberanos y espacios marítimos. ; The article analyzes the non-appearance before the International Court of Justice motivated by the turbulent reception by the Colombian Government of the 2012 and 2016 sentences of the I.C.J in the cases between Nicaragua and Colombia, with the objective of establishing the consequences of such conduct. Methodologically, the jurisprudence that has applied Article 53 of the Statute, and the different consequences of nonappearance in cases before the Court are studied. Through an analysis of jurisprudence the document discusses the nature of non-appearance, its effects on the sentence, the agents, the applicable law, the evidence and the procedure, to conclude that, although non-appearance is a behavior allowed to the State Parties, it is in general detrimental to its procedural interests, its defense of the case and the administration of international justice as a system, especially in such technical cases as those related to maritime delimitation and liability in relation to alleged violations of sovereign rights and maritime spaces.