Suchergebnisse

This Study describes community involvement in the development planning process through the community action plan program. The case study in this research takes the process of structuring the Bukit Duri village in South Jakarta, Indonesia. In this study, the method used is qualitative with in-depth interviews, online media content analysis and data processing using the Nvivo 12+ application. The object of research is whether the Community Action Plan (CAP) program can provide solutions to the residents of Bukit Duri and what is the role of the actors involved in implementing the Community Action Plan (CAP) program. The results showed that the Community Action Plan (CAP) program was not successful in being implemented in Bukit Duri, South Jakarta due to the lack of a collaborative process from related parties such as citizens, government and civil society. Other obstacles in implementing the program include the availability of land, legality, and community commitment. Future research is expected to be able to discuss alternative policies taken by the government after the failure of implementing the community action plan.

This study describes community development in the preparation for a community action plan for slum management in DKI Jakarta. The case study chosen for this research is the Akuarium village. The existence of slums is an inseparable part of the development of a city. The slum area contributes to several problems such as population density, building conditions, ventilation, sanitation, garbage, drainage, environmental roads, lighting and building layout. In an effort to overcome these problems, it is important to develop a community development concept that emphasizes the participation of the community through collaborative work between the government and citizens in the development process. The research that has been done has not touched on the substance of the problem faced by the urban poor and how the community plays a role in supporting the program. The purpose of this research is to find out how community-based development patterns can encourage collaborative work of each actor in structuring slum villages in DKI Jakarta. In this study, the method used is qualitative with in-depth interviews and data processing using the Nvivo 12+ application. The results showed that the principles of community development, including integrated development, participation, sustainable development, empowerment, and human rights, greatly influence the collaborative work of various stakeholders in planning an Akuarium development action plan.

This study describes the process of accountability of DIY special funds in realizing the prosperity of DIY society 2013-2017. Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the regions that get the special policy in the form of asymmetric decentralization. This policy is effective since the enactment of Law Number 13 the Year 2012 on the Specialties of DIY. In particular, this regulation regulates 5 privileged affairs: the procedures for filling the positions, positions, duties and authorities of the Governor and Vice Governor, the regional government of DIY, the affairs of culture, the land affairs and spatial affairs. The hope that decentralization policy in Indonesia can improve the people's welfare significantly has not been fulfilled. This is like what happened in Yogyakarta Special Region which has special authority to manage its government affairs. However, these expectations still cannot be met well. This study aims to analyze the accountability model for the utilization of DIY privileged funds so as to provide policy recommendations to be taken. This research uses the qualitative method with data collection method with in-depth interview technique, elite interview, and documentation. The results showed that the poverty rate in DIY until March 2017 about 488.53 thousand people or about 13.02% and Ratio Gini DIY by 0.425%. This is not worth the number of privileged funds that increase each year. It is, therefore, necessary in the determination of success indicators of achievement and output in accordance with the output and outcome to be achieved. In addition, the accountability process also includes not only technical in report submission but also ensuring that process and involving the community in the planning process until accountability.

This study describes the Golkar Party recruitment process in the 2019 Legislative Election with a case study of the allocation of seats in the Tangerang Districts A and B districts. The problem of recruitment has an impact on the distribution of legislative candidates in allocating DPRD seats, in PKPU RI Number 16 Year 2017 Concerning the Arrangement of Electoral Districts and Chair Allocation Members of the Regency/City Regional People's Representative Council in the General Election, that the seat allocation is a determination of the number of seats in an electoral district. This study used qualitative methods by conducting in-depth interviews and literature studies through sources relevant to this research. The results of the study show that the Golkar Party recruitment pattern is still using the old pattern, namely by using the recruitment system during the new order and trying to retain traditional (old) voters. In the upcoming recruitment, Golkar must involve various elements in the community and the beginning of the recruitment must start from the "grassroots" which can gradually occupy the party management positions. Keywords: Recruitment, Golkar Party, Seat Allocation, and Electoral District.

The characteristic of a democratic country is implementation of election. In Indonesia it has include in national and local levels. Local elections held simultaneously in 2015, 2017 and 2018. One of the city conducting the election is Yogyakarta City. In the specifically this research explain about electoral governance in electoral integrity perspective. All stages of election which consists of pre-election, election period and post-election. This research use qualitative research method through interview and documentation. The results of this study indicated that electoral governance in Yogyakarta City has integrity in accordance with the principles of electoral integrity applied in the stages of election implementation include pre-election, election process and post-election. In this research are not use all of the indicators to analyse the stages of election. This is because adjusted with the findings of research with information obtained through several sources. The first, at the planning and program, the indicators analyse include the implementation of democratic principles, transparency and accountability. The second, socialization and voter information, indicators analyse include the implementation of democratic principles, transparency and professionalism. The third, campaigns, indicators analyse include transparency, accountability, code of ethics and supervision. The fourth, voting and vote counting, the indicators analyse include democratic principle, professionalism, institutional safeguards and supervision. The fifth, the resolution of election disputes, indicators analyse are ethical codes and accountability.

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh konflik Nahdlatul Wathan terhadap perilaku politik masyarakat Lombok Timur. Nahdlatul Wathan atau disingkat NW merupakan organisasi sosial keagamaan terbesar di Lombok yang berpusat di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Nahdlatul Wathan didirikan oleh Tuan Guru Hajji (TGH) Muhammad Zainuddin Abdul Madjid pada tahun 1953. Nahdlatul Wathan bergerak dalam bidang pendidikan, sosial dan dakwah, sehingga NW mempunyai kontribusi besar dalam pembangunan dan pemerintahan. Pasca meninggalnya TGH. Muhammad Zainuddin Abdul Madjid tahun 1997, Nahdlatul Wathan terpecah kedalam dua kubu, yakni kubu Rauhun (R1) yang berpusat di desa Pancor dan kubu Raihanun (R2) yang berpusat di desa Anjani. Pecahnya Nahdlatul Wathan sebagai organisasi terbesar di Lombok Timur tentu membawa dampak bagi kehidupan masyarakat. Dengan demikian menarik untuk melakukan penelitian terkait dengan pengaruh konflik Nahdaltul Wathan terhadap Perilaku Politik Masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan peneliti adalah penelitian kuantitaif deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Teknik pengambilan data melalui kuisioner dan studi pustaka, sedangkan teknik analisisa data menggunkan analisa statistic dengan memanfaatkan softwere SPSS.

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pelaksanaan kekarantinaan kesehatan di Indonesia yang dilakukan oleh pemerintahan daerah yang dikenal dengan istilah Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar. PSBB ini diterapkan untuk mencegah penyebaran virus Corona (Covid-19). Salah satu daerah yang menerapkan kebijakan ini adalah Kota Tangerang. PSBB terebut sudah memasuki 5 tahap. Masalah yang di hadapi oleh pemerintah adalah masyarakat banyak yang mengabaikan protokol kesehatan yang harus wajib di jalani di masa pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif. Peneliti melakukan wawancara mendalam dengan beberapa stakeholders untuk mendapatkan informasi terkait implementasi PSBB dan outcome yang dihasilkan dari pelaksanaan PSBB di Kota Tangerang.This study aims to explain the implementation of health quarantine in Indonesia carried out by the regional government known as Large-Scale Social Restrictions. This PSBB is applied to prevent the spread of Coronavirus (Covid-19). One area that implements this policy is the City of Tangerang. The PSBB has entered 5 stages. The problem faced by the government is that many people ignore the health protocols that must be mandatory to live in the Covid-19 pandemic. This research uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with several stakeholders to obtain information related to the implementation of PSBB and the outcome resulting from the implementation of PSBB in Tangerang City.

Civil society groups and political parties have disagreed with the presidential threshold article passed by Parliament and the government. The regulation is considered to limit the democratic rights and freedom of the public in choosing, determining, and submitting themselves as presidential candidates. This study aims to explain how actors (agencies) build movements against presidential threshold regulations (structure). The theory used in this study is Anthony Giddens' structuration theory. This research uses qualitative methods by analyzing some content in online media and Constitutional Court rulings related to presidential threshold lawsuits and processing data using the Nvivo 12+ application. The findings of this study indicate that the most crucial aspect of the movement against actors is that it is conducted by challenging the presidential threshold rule before the Constitutional Court, developing public opinion, and holding multiple demonstrations. Second, the size of the presidential threshold rejection vote is based on the future of democracy and freedom, weakening the presidential system and contradicting other regulations. Third, of the many lawsuits filed by the public and political parties, the Constitutional Court has consistently rejected them because the rule is an open legal policy, which means fully being a lawmaker, in this case, in Parliament.

Successful elections have an important objective in the quality of holding an election. millennials have political power that makes a significant contribution to the candidates. The many millennials will determine how much they will contribute to the 2019 elections in Indonesia. This is so as a reference in the objectives of benchmarks for the next election as well as for political parties and candidates. Thus, political participation will increase if millennials use their voting rights as a form of contribution to the success of the 2019 elections in Indonesian. Thus the researchers used a qualitative method with Nvivo 12 plus descriptive analysis techniques using the Crosstab Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Concept Map and Project Map Analysis, and Discourse Analysis features. There are three stages of the process, the first is Ncapture website and article, the second stage is analyzing with Nvivo 12 plus to read text and content that has the same meaning, words, and context that make interrelations between the website and article; the third stage of the discourse analysis is the analysis and meaning of a relevant website and article content. The conclusion of this study is knowing the contribution of millennials to the success of the 2019 elections in Indonesia.