Suchergebnisse

Artikel ini ditulis dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis, tentang faktor-faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi proses pelaksanaan omnibus law, dalam proses pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Lapangan kerja di Indonesia. Tulisan ini akan menggunakan teori sibernetika Talcott Parsons yang digunakan sebagai pisau analisis, untuk menjelaskan fakta yang terjadi saat ini. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa proses pelaksanaan omnibus law dalam pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Lapangan kerja di Indonesia, saat ini dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, faktor-faktor tersebut yaitu adalah faktor sub sistem ekonomi, sub sistem politik, sub sistem sosial, dan sub sistem budaya, sebagaimana dikemukakan oleh Talcott Parsons dalam teori sibernetikanya. Pengaruh faktor-faktor tersebut yang kemudian pada saat ini, menimbulkan berbagai reaksi penolakan dari masyarakat Indonesia, sehingga dalam kesimpulanya penulis mengajukan saran kepada pemerintah agar sekiranya proses pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Lapangan kerja di Indonesia tidak dilakukan secara terburu-buru, hal ini berguna dalam rangka mengkaji terlebih dahulu, tentang bagaimana pelaksanaan omnibus law dalam pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Lapangan kerja di Indonesia agar dapat diterima sepenuhnya oleh masyarakat.

This study aims to provide knowledge about how to resolve village head election disputes in Indonesia after the issuance of Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. This research is qualitative research with a normative juridical approach. This research will focus on the discussion of how to resolve election disputes for Village Heads in Indonesia after the issuance of Law No. 6 of 2014, and how problems arise due to the settlement of disputes over the results of the Village Head election after the issuance of Law No. 6 of 2014. The results show that Law No. 6/2014 has mandated that the settlement of Village Head election disputes that are settled by the Regent / Mayor is no later than 30 days after the determination of the Village Head candidate elected by the Village Head election committee, however in its implementation there are still problems, these problems can be seen from not regulating changes and settling disputes over the results of the Village Head election. In addition, the problem with the authority given to the Regent / Mayor to resolve disputes over the results of the Village Head election is when the Regent / Mayor is a state institution that has the power of the state in the executive, not the judiciary, the Regent / Mayor is also a product of political parties, so that the authority is given It is feared that the authority to implement disputes over the results of the Village Head election will not be objective. The conclusion of this research is to form a special judicial institution for disputes over the results of village head elections.Keywords: Labor Social Security, Parking Attendants, Department of Transportation

This study aims to examine and analyze the form of cooperative relationships between companies and cooperatives that use the principle of partnership in agribusiness and how the legal protection of the state against cooperatives in cooperation with companies in the field of agribusiness. This study uses normative juridical research methods. Normative juridical research is research that utilizes secondary data and primary data as the main data. This study uses an empirical juridical approach and a statutory approach, which in the discussion of this study will use descriptive analysis to describe the findings in the field. The results of the study indicate that at this time, cooperation between companies and cooperatives that use the principle of partnership in the field of agribusiness can be carried out in aspects such as capital, technology, marketing, production facilities, production processes, product processing, and so on, while the form of state legal protection that the state must implement against cooperatives in cooperation with companies in the agribusiness sector is in the form of preventive legal protection from the government, namely in terms of price determination, such as determining interest on capital loans to determining market prices.

This study aims to find out and analyze how the settlement of disputes over the election results of village heads in Indonesia, after the birth of Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, as well as how the legal problems that arise from the existence of these regulations. This research is a normative juridical study with the main data used in the form of secondary data, while the approach taken is to use an approach to the laws and regulations (Statute approaches). The results showed that the disputes over the results of village head elections in Indonesia at this time, experienced a development and legal problems in its enforcement. The problem referred to is that when Law No. 6 of 2014 gave the Regent / Mayor authority in resolving disputes over the results of village head elections, with this fact, several legal problems arose, especially when the Regent / Mayor was a state institution whose main task was not to enforce the law, and the handling of the settlement will be difficult to be objective because there will be mixed political responsibilities in the settlement process

The House of Representatives is a state institution that functions in the field of legislation. The current fact is that the DPR's performance in the field of legislation always gets records, because the resulting Law is still below Prolegnas target. On the basis of the problems as referred to, the writing of this article aims to find out what the problems and the efforts that need to be made in overcoming the problem of the formation of laws which fall under the authority of the DPR are. In the discussion, the author tries to provide criticism aimed at the process of forming a law in the DPR, seen from three indicators, namely from the legal substance factor, the legal structure factor and the legal culture factor, the legal substance relating to the current Law does not regulate the maximum number of Prolegnas, the legal structure related to law-forming institutions originating from political parties, and the legal culture related to community rejection of the bill being discussed. The solution to these 3 (three) problems needs to be changed, such as strengthening regulations regarding restrictions on performance-based Prolegnas submissions, making Integrity Facts for DPR members and regulations governing public involvement in making laws stronger, this needs to be done in order to keep it up. maintain the level of public trust in the DPR in carrying out its legislative functions.