Suchergebnisse

У статті досліджується правова природа володіння як юридично закріпленої можливості використання житла, аналізується практика Європейського суду з прав людини щодо можливості застосування виселення на підставі рішення суду, а також досліджуються умови та підстави виселення особи із гуртожитку без надання іншого житла за відсутності правових підстав для його використання. ; The article explores the legal nature of ownership in the context of the realization of the right to housing, in particular, based on the European Court of Human Rights's case law that housing loss is the most extreme form of interference with the right to respect for housing, accordingly, should be applied only as a last resort. Studying the reasons for evictions from the hostel, the author analyzed the current legislation of Ukraine for the last year and found that the overwhelming majority of claims is to recognize persons who have lost their right to use their homes and to withdraw from their registration at the place of residence or removal from their premises without providing a different home or the recognition of the right to use and permanent residence on legal grounds and the obligation not to obstruct the use and residence.Also, the article investigates the possession as a legally secured use of housing for the provision of housing, and analyzes cases when a person who has been internally immersed in the hostel on legal grounds, but uses housing in the absence of legal grounds. Accordingly, it was concluded that when considering the courts of this category of cases, it is necessary to take into account not only the fact of the lawful introduction, but also the fact of lawful use of the accommodation provided in the hostel. In addition, it is necessary to confirm the presence of grounds for eviction from the hostel without the provision of other housing at the court's decision, which must meet the criteria set out in paragraph 2 of Art. 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

У статті досліджується правова природа володіння як юридично закріпленої можливості використання житла, аналізується практика Європейського суду з прав людини щодо можливості застосування виселення на підставі рішення суду, а також досліджуються умови та підстави виселення особи із гуртожитку без надання іншого житла за відсутності правових підстав для його використання. ; The article explores the legal nature of ownership in the context of the realization of the right to housing, in particular, based on the European Court of Human Rights's case law that housing loss is the most extreme form of interference with the right to respect for housing, accordingly, should be applied only as a last resort. Studying the reasons for evictions from the hostel, the author analyzed the current legislation of Ukraine for the last year and found that the overwhelming majority of claims is to recognize persons who have lost their right to use their homes and to withdraw from their registration at the place of residence or removal from their premises without providing a different home or the recognition of the right to use and permanent residence on legal grounds and the obligation not to obstruct the use and residence.Also, the article investigates the possession as a legally secured use of housing for the provision of housing, and analyzes cases when a person who has been internally immersed in the hostel on legal grounds, but uses housing in the absence of legal grounds. Accordingly, it was concluded that when considering the courts of this category of cases, it is necessary to take into account not only the fact of the lawful introduction, but also the fact of lawful use of the accommodation provided in the hostel. In addition, it is necessary to confirm the presence of grounds for eviction from the hostel without the provision of other housing at the court's decision, which must meet the criteria set out in paragraph 2 of Art. 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.