Suchergebnisse

The objective of the research was to analyze some international standards for the safety of people who attend criminal justice from different approaches and perspectives of analysis. Based on a meaningful analysis of the provisions of international and regional regulatory legal acts, the document presents approaches to the formation of standards to ensure the safety of persons who contribute to criminal justice. Methodologically, the work applied the provisions of dialectics, general, special and particular scientific methods. In the course of the study, scientific-historical, formal-legal, formal-logical, systemic and comparative methods were also used. It is concluded that the system of security measures for people who cooperate with criminal justice has significant differences in the different national criminal justice systems, which complicates international relations and cooperation in this area and does not allow the international community to advise effectively and comprehensively, while continuously generating challenges and threats.

Based on comparative-legal analysis of the jury trials development in Russia and foreign countries, the authors have shown, that broadening of jury trials powers, resulted in remoteness from finding the truth in criminal cases. Concession of the jury's opinion priority over the professionalism of the judge and the evidences, received in the process of investigation, put in jeopardy the fairness and objectivity of the court's decision. As a result, the court, based on the avesty of justicejury's conclusions, is forced, in some cases, to make a travesty of justice.