Suchergebnisse

1928-1932 : ethnic nation and Social Democratic consolidation -- Making the "people's home," 1945-1950 -- 1968-1975 : security, equality and choice : expanding the people's home -- 1991-1995 : people's home no longer? : the breakdown of the miraculous welfare machine -- The end of Social Democracy hegemony -- Conclusions : who "belongs" in the Swedish people's home?

This article seeks to understand how values enter into political discourse via justification and how those values are negotiated over time. The article maps out the terrain of diversity discourses, both as a specific type of discourse and as an example of ethical, moral and pragmatic modes of argumentation. The author examines Swedish "diversity discourses" in the periods of 1968–1975 and 1991–1995 in an effort to tease out the pragmatic, moral and ethical aspects of these discourses. Diversity discourses are defined as discourses regarding how much and what kind of diversity is acceptable or desirable in a society, as well as how such diversity should be handled. I find that values, both contextually-dependent ethical values and universal moral values, rather than being "prior" to politics, arise out of the intersection of pragmatic, ethical and moral discourses. What is moral and ethical, then is colored by the particular nexus of moral, ethical and pragmatic concerns such that what is acceptable at one particular time and location, may be unacceptable in another, even coming from the same actors with the same ideological commitments. Shifts in the ethical/moral modes of justification, then, lead to shifts in who is included in a democratic community.

AbstractThis paper examines the creation of 'national day' inSweden in order to understand how such a holiday works to shape theSwedish nation's relationship with diversity. Analyzing parliamentary debates and press coverage, the author finds that official national day coverage tends to invest the nation with progressive and multicultural meanings, foregrounding immigrant voices. However, this multiculturalism is polysemic, vague and subject to contestation, both from far right 'traditionalists' seeking to 'protect'Swedishness from outside influences and cosmopolitans who see the nation as outdated and dangerous. The creation of a new national holiday can be seen as a 'democratic iteration' wherein democracy is restated and reinvested with meanings, and new lines of cleavage are drawn, and also as a 'multicultural iteration' where multiculturalism is invested with new meaning. Finally, the author argues that multiculturalism benefits from polysemy in that the concept can then adapt to changing circumstances, and, thus, survive.