Das Shareholder-Value-Prinzip im Spannungsfeld von Theorie und Praxis
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 95, Heft S1, S. 3-14
ISSN: 1865-9748
40 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 95, Heft S1, S. 3-14
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 93, Heft 2, S. 207-220
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 90, Heft 1, S. 139-159
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 87, Heft 1-2, S. 95-123
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Journal of Financial Perspectives, Band 1, Heft 2
SSRN
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 100, Heft 5, S. 719-731
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 35, Heft 1, S. 9-34
ISSN: 1468-0440
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 97, Heft 4, S. 463-477
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 95, Heft S1, S. 111-128
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 88, Heft 2-3, S. 489-514
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 944-972
ISSN: 1468-0440
AbstractThis paper examines the relationship between customer satisfaction and profitability at the level of the individual customer. In many industries, investigations detect a positive, decreasing relationship between customer satisfaction and firm profitability. The insurance industry has rarely been the object of such investigations. Pooser and Browne (2018) started this discussion by examining U.S. insurers at the firm level. We provide reasons why the positive satisfaction–profitability relationship might be reversed, particularly in the case of the insurance industry. We conduct an array of OLS regressions with customer-level data. Our results reveal a strong positive relationship between customer satisfaction and profitability. The effect is considerably large and also robust when investigating the effect of several customer characteristics on this relationship. We recommend that the increase in profitability is induced by a strong positive correlation between customer satisfaction and premium income, while satisfaction is not associated with the combined ratio.
In: The Geneva papers on risk and insurance - issues and practice, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 906-940
ISSN: 1468-0440
AbstractWe analyze the preferences of 1180 German consumers for investment guarantees in financial products by means of choice-based conjoint and latent class analysis. Based on the segment-level partworth utility profiles, we then identify the most important investment guarantee features, analyze consumer demand in a realistic market setting, and test whether individual purchasing behavior can be explained by socioeconomic characteristics. Our results show that two buyer and two nonbuyer segments exist. Although their willingness to buy varies significantly, we document only a small degree of heterogeneity with respect to the individual guarantee attributes and levels. Across the sample, the guarantee period is most important, followed by the volatility of the underlying fund, and the up-front premium. Finally, we illustrate that particularly those socioeconomic characteristics with an impact on individuals' financial situation are promising predictors of their willingness to purchase investment guarantees.
In: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, Band 108, Heft 5, S. 365-381
ISSN: 1865-9748
In: Dissertationen No. 4848
In: Universität St. Gallen
Paper I, "The Liability Regime of Insurance Pools and Its Impact on Pricing", addresses the pricing of insurance premiums for specific forms of risk sharing in the insurance industry. The implicit diversification effect from this risk sharing on the default risk is discussed in connection with a possible joint liability of the co-insurers. The discussion focuses in particular on the risk-adequate premium in a contingent claims approach under various premises, which incidentally reflects the varying effectiveness of the joint liability mechanism to protect the policyholder from the adverse consequences of insolvencies in the risk sharing arrangement. Paper II, "Sometimes More, Sometimes Less: Prudence and the Diversification of Risky Insurance Coverage", considers in a three-state model the optimal level of insurance coverage for a risk-averse policyholder who can split by assumption the insurance policy, and hence the default risk, between several insurance companies. The results indicate whether more diversification by an increased number of insurers entails normatively more or less insurance coverage and how this depends on the insurers' default correlation as well as the policyholder's degree of prudence. Given a model with a continuous loss distribution, Paper III, "Optimal Management of Counterparty Risk in Reinsurance Contracts", derives optimal strategies for a risk-averse primary insurer to manage the counterparty risk in reinsurance contracts. The range of strategies comprises explicit hedging, diversification with two reinsurers, or a mixture of both. In view of the trade-off between costs and security the results suggest a layering of the reinsurance coverage with a layer-specific application of the different risk management instruments. While Paper II and III rest on the assumption of a non-stochastic loss given default, Paper IV, "Tailing the Tail: Insurance Demand, Default Risk, and a Random Loss Given Default", eases this assumption by introducing a random variable for the loss given default and researches the according effects on the optimal level of insurance coverage. In addition, a distribution of the loss given default is fitted from empirical data referring concurrently to the difficulties involved.
In: Journal of Risk and Insurance, Band 86, Heft 3, S. 629-661
SSRN