Search results

This article analyzes how the two United Nations Tribunals, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), have defined the notion of a fair trial by adopting the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The article argues that fundamental due process has experienced a revival in the Criminal Tribunals due to gaps in the Rules being filled in response to the ICCPR. The article examines particularly Articles 9 and 14 of the ICCPR.

European criminal law and Brexit / Kai Ambos -- Energising the law's response to terrorism : the decision of the Appeals Chamber of the special tribunal of Lebanon and the need for further action / David Baragwanath -- The transnational dimension of the ne bis in idem principle and the notion of Res judicata in the European Union / Martin Bose -- "The global panopticon" mass surveillance and data privacy : intrusion as a crime against humanity? / Michael Bohlander -- Environmental and cultural heritage crimes : the possibilities under the -- OME Statute / Helen Brady and David Re -- The role of comparative law in transnational criminal justice / Albin Eser -- Protecting human rights through exclusionary rules? highlights on a conflict in criminal proceedings from a comparative perspective / Sabine Gless -- Implementing Kampala : the new crime of aggression under the German code of crimes against international law / Florian Jeberger

Eisele, M.: Ruanda 1994 : die internationale Gemeinschaft hat nur wenige Lehren gezogen. - S. 51-58