Policy characteristics, electoral cycles, and the partisan politics of climate change
In: Global environmental politics, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 44-72
ISSN: 1536-0091
44 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Global environmental politics, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 44-72
ISSN: 1536-0091
World Affairs Online
In: Japan: Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, S. 119-144
ISSN: 0343-6950
World Affairs Online
In: Japan: Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, S. 130-152
ISSN: 0343-6950
World Affairs Online
In: The Pacific review, Band 32, Heft 5, S. 809-830
ISSN: 1470-1332
Ever since the so-called rise of China has started, Sino-Japanese relations have been increasingly described as a rivalry between both states. For the most part, this assumed rivalry has been analyzed on the global level or within the boundaries of the East Asian region, while the consequences of this rivalry for other world regions, such as the Middle East, have been largely neglected in the literature. In order to fill this gap, this article investigates how China's growing presence in the Middle East, and in particular regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, influences Japan's own foreign policy in this troubled region. It utilizes a modified concept of the strategic rivalry approach, called 'asymmetric rivalry', which challenges the widespread notion that rivalry needs to be mutually perceived by both sides and thus analyzes the assumed Sino-Japanese rivalry in the Middle East from a Japanese perspective. By focusing on the case of Japan's CEAPAD initiative, which aims at coordinating East Asian countries' developmental assistance towards the Palestinian Authority while deliberately excluding China, the present article shows that the perception of Japan's foreign policy elite of China as a rival decisively influences how Japan's foreign policy is shaped in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. (Pac Rev/GIGA)
World Affairs Online
In: Japan: Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, S. 100-120
ISSN: 0343-6950
World Affairs Online
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, S. lcw018
ISSN: 1470-4838
In: Lecture Notes in Energy; Energy Policy Making in the EU, S. 63-83
In: Environmental politics, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 115-139
ISSN: 1743-8934
The advancing internationalisation of environmental politics has triggered increasing interest in factors that lead countries to participate in international environmental agreements. But do partisan differences matter for such ratification decisions? An analysis of the ratification responses of 21 OECD countries toward 64 treaties shows that partisan environmentalism matters for ratification behaviour whereas left-right differences do not play a significant role. More precisely, while the likelihood of ratification increases when overall government positions are more pro-environment, pro-environment veto players and environmental ministers are not found to play a role. These results hold against a number of controls and correcting for potential error in the measurement of party positions. Adapted from the source document.
In: Environmental politics, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 115-139
ISSN: 0964-4016
In: Environmental politics, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 115-139
ISSN: 1743-8934
In: Wohlstand und Gesundheit für alle Bd. 1
In: Japan: Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, S. 103-125
ISSN: 0343-6950
World Affairs Online
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 221-247
ISSN: 1470-4838
World Affairs Online
In: Public administration: an international quarterly, Band 94, Heft 1, S. 57-72
ISSN: 0033-3298
In: Environment and planning. C, Government and policy, Band 33, Heft 5, S. 950-968
ISSN: 1472-3425
The European Union requires its member states to establish national targets for the biofuel content of all diesel and petrol supplies for transport placed on the market. This study explores the adoption of this European Union policy across South-Eastern and Eastern Europe between 2003 and 2012. In theoretical terms, we are specifically interested in examining the role of interest groups for policy adoption. We argue that the oil industry in general and the producers of biofuels in particular will support the establishment of national biofuel targets because they expect economic gains. By contrast, we expect environmental groups with international and regional ties to oppose such targets because biofuels have come under attack for their potential environmental impact including deforestation, a loss in biodiversity, and food insecurity. Empirically, we concentrate on policy adoptions in 21 South-Eastern and Eastern European states with varied relations to the European Union and the Energy Community. Our analysis supports our main arguments in suggesting that a stronger presence of environmental groups decreases the chances of adopting national biofuel targets across our country sample while producer interests tend to increase adoptions. This finding holds true also when controlling for a country's European Union membership and accession perspective, membership in the Energy Community, and additional domestic-level factors. These results add more generally to our understanding about compliance with European Union policies and environmental governance.