23 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Neue politische Literatur: Berichte aus Geschichts- und Politikwissenschaft ; (NPL), Band 46, Heft 3, S. 417
ISSN: 0028-3320
In: Cultural trends, Band 16, Heft 2, S. 99-196
ISSN: 1469-3690
In: International journal of cultural policy: CP, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 235-236
ISSN: 1477-2833
In: International journal of cultural policy: CP, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 181-196
ISSN: 1477-2833
In: International journal of cultural policy: CP, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 549-554
ISSN: 1477-2833
In: International journal of urban and regional research: IJURR, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 928-930
ISSN: 0309-1317
In: Journal of policy analysis and management: the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Band 17, Heft 2, S. 322-333
ISSN: 1520-6688
In: Nonprofit management & leadership, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 253-269
ISSN: 1542-7854
AbstractThe introduction of performance indicators into the field of the arts and culture has been fraught with difficulties. It is the premise of this article that many of those difficulties can be traced to tensions arising out of the actual uses of performance indicators in the arts. Based on concrete examples of the use of performance indicators, the author examines four different functions—affecting behavior, evaluating behavior, monitoring behavior, and inferring behavior—and explores some of the issues arising from each one.
In: The European Journal of Cultural Policy, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 185-188
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 700-702
ISSN: 1468-0491
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration and institutions, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 700-702
ISSN: 0952-1895
In: The European Journal of Cultural Policy, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 21-41
In: Nonprofit management & leadership, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 37-57
ISSN: 1542-7854
AbstractThis article explores how nonprofit organizations respond to proposed changes in the relationship between the government and the nonprofit sector using a case study of the "formula funding" controversy at the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). The article shows how powerful notions of who should get to decide permeate and continually transform the funding debate, making public interest reforms of the process extremely difficult. The author concludes by suggesting that the victories the arts field can claim in defending the current practice of peer panel review at the NEA will turn out to be Pyrrhic victories, ultimately weakening the claim of the nonprofit arts on public resources.
In: The European Journal of Cultural Policy, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 179-184