Suchergebnisse

Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die Bedeutung von Grenzen in der Entwicklungsgeschichte des Journalismus. Dabei steht die Frage im Zentrum, inwiefern sich an Grenzverschiebungen Wendepunkte der Journalismusgeschichte festmachen lassen und ob die Neuziehung von Grenzen als Indikator für Wandel und Innovation im Journalismus gesehen werden kann. Hierzu wird zunächst reflektiert, mit welchen Herausforderungen es einhergeht, ein Konzept oder ein Verständnis von Journalismus in verschiedenen Zeiten und unter wechselnden Bedingungen anzuwenden. Anschließend werden vier wiederkehrend aktualisierte Grenzdebatten zum Journalismus entlang historischer Beispiele reflektiert: Grenzen des Machbaren, Grenzen der Zugehörigkeit, Grenzen der Zuständigkeit und Grenzen des Zulässigen.

The hopes regarding the positive impact of the Internet and digital participation in civic society have faded in recent years. The digital realm is now increasingly discussed regarding its role in putting democracy in jeopardy and polarizing public debate by propagating extremist views and falsehoods. Likewise, the perception of so-called alternative media as beneficial carriers of counter-public spheres and as important complements to mainstream positions in social debate has flipped. Alternative media are now often associated with the "Wicked web" of disinformation, political populism, or even radicalization. Following Quandt's (2018) notion of 'dark participation' and Phillips and Milner's (2017) description of the Internet as ambivalent, this article asks, whether the same holds true for the users of alternative media: a segment of the audience traditionally discussed in terms of community, engagement, participation, and strong ideological identification with progressive political causes. Do users of 'dark' alternative media bond with their media in similar ways to constitute communities of darkness? Based on interviews with 35 users of alternative media from a left-leaning, right-wing, Russian-tied and/or conspiracy spectrum users, uses of alternative media are pictured as grey rather than black or white. The findings illuminate the ambivalences within alternative media users as audiences and communities. Ambivalences are found regarding the use of alternative sources as audience or community members, regarding a shared attitude of criticality and anti-systemness, which connects trans-medially and trans-ideologically, as well as the experienced comfort of community, which can become a main motivation for use.

The hopes regarding the positive impact of the Internet and digital participation in civic society have faded in recent years. The digital realm is now increasingly discussed regarding its role in putting democracy in jeopardy and polarizing public debate by propagating extremist views and falsehoods. Likewise, the perception of so-called alternative media as beneficial carriers of counter-public spheres and as important complements to mainstream positions in social debate has flipped. Alternative media are now often associated with the "Wicked web" of disinformation, political populism, or even radicalization. Following Quandt's (2018) notion of 'dark participation' and Phillips and Milner's (2017) description of the Internet as ambivalent, this article asks, whether the same holds true for the users of alternative media: a segment of the audience traditionally discussed in terms of community, engagement, participation, and strong ideological identification with progressive political causes. Do users of 'dark' alternative media bond with their media in similar ways to constitute communities of darkness? Based on interviews with 35 users of alternative media from a left-leaning, right-wing, Russian-tied and/or conspiracy spectrum users, uses of alternative media are pictured as grey rather than black or white. The findings illuminate the ambivalences within alternative media users as audiences and communities. Ambivalences are found regarding the use of alternative sources as audience or community members, regarding a shared attitude of criticality and anti-systemness, which connects trans-medially and trans-ideologically, as well as the experienced comfort of community, which can become a main motivation for use.

While the perils of social media, fake news, and an alleged distrust in legacy media have attained considerable public attention, the implications of these public narratives for their audiences have remained understudied. The aim of this article is to identify consequences of an emerged "fake news and post truth-era-narrative" for media users' personal epistemologies, media beliefs, and news navigation practices from a media repertoire perspective. Forty-nine in-depth media-biographical interviews with people from three different age groups and with different media repertoires were conducted. Based on the study, the three interrelated dimensions (1) selective criticality, (2) pragmatic trust, and (3) competence–confidence were developed to analyze users' media and news navigation. These three dimensions can be applied to other scenarios to investigate how people navigate their media repertoires and interact with the news in general.

The hopes regarding the positive impact of the Internet and digital participation in civic society have faded in recent years. The digital realm is now increasingly discussed regarding its role in putting democracy in jeopardy and polarizing public debate by propagating extremist views and falsehoods. Likewise, the perception of so-called alternative media as beneficial carriers of counter-public spheres and as important complements to mainstream positions in social debate has flipped. Alternative media are now often associated with the "Wicked web" of disinformation, political populism, or even radicalization. Following Quandt's (2018) notion of 'dark participation' and Phillips and Milner's (2017) description of the Internet as ambivalent, this article asks, whether the same holds true for the users of alternative media: a segment of the audience traditionally discussed in terms of community, engagement, participation, and strong ideological identification with progressive political causes. Do users of 'dark' alternative media bond with their media in similar ways to constitute communities of darkness? Based on interviews with 35 users of alternative media from a left-leaning, right-wing, Russian-tied and/or conspiracy spectrum users, uses of alternative media are pictured as grey rather than black or white. The findings illuminate the ambivalences within alternative media users as audiences and communities. Ambivalences are found regarding the use of alternative sources as audience or community members, regarding a shared attitude of criticality and anti-systemness, which connects trans-medially and trans-ideologically, as well as the experienced comfort of community, which can become a main motivation for use.

Die Kommunikationswissenschaft betrachtet Europa meist in einer Perspektive von oben, während der kommunikative Alltag von Menschen kaum in den Fokus gerät. Der Autor hingegen untersucht die Bedeutung von "Europa" für kollektive Zugehörigkeit und die Formierung von (transnationaler) Öffentlichkeit von unten. Dazu diskutiert er die Lebenswelt des Alltags im Kontext von Globalisierung, Transnationalisierung, Mobilisierung und Mediatisierung und identifiziert Bausteine für eine Theorie des Kommunikationsraums. Diese ermöglichen es, alltägliche Lebenswelten und transnationale Vergemeinschaftungsprozesse unter Mediatisierungsbedingungen analytisch zu fassen. Das vorgeschlagene Verständnis von Kommunikationsraum ist dabei nicht auf "Europa" begrenzt, sondern auf eine Vielzahl von Fragestellungen anwendbar, die medien- und soziokulturellen Wandel in einer nicht medienzentrierten Perspektive adressieren.

"This paper emanates from the consideration that communication history cannot only focus on communication that is within today's past but must also to cope with challenges communication history will face in 'tomorrow's yesterdays'. In nowadays perspective, apparent challenges for the future of communication historiography are posed by the impact of (now) new media technologies and digitalization. The article reflects about different shifts digitalization may bring for communication historiography, in terms of digital media as sources and the impact of digital communication on the understanding of temporal and spatial relations in communication historiography. Doing so, the paper discusses from a communication studies perspective if 'new media' history likewise entails a new 'media history'. The article concludes that digital media will prompt communication historians to adapt to new conditions. Such adaption to the respective 'new' is depicted as constituent of historical research as communication history has ever been kind of change management." (author's abstract)