Spracherhalt oder Sprachverlagerung?: Erstsprachgebrauch und Zweitsprachkompetenzen bei Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund
In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie: KZfSS, Band 68, Heft 2, S. 309-339
ISSN: 1861-891X
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie: KZfSS, Band 68, Heft 2, S. 309-339
ISSN: 1861-891X
In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie: KZfSS, Band 68, Heft 2, S. 309-339
ISSN: 0023-2653
In: Journal of ethnic and migration studies: JEMS, Band 46, Heft 7, S. 1348-1370
ISSN: 1469-9451
Sekundärdatenanalyse des Nationalen Bildungspanels (NEPS), Startkohorte 3, Wellen 1-3, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC3:8.0.1.
Der Beitrag untersucht auf der Grundlage eines allgemeinen theoretischen Modells die Effekte einer unterschiedlich strikt geregelten Differenzierung auf die Leistungen in der Sekundarstufe. Grundlage sind Daten der "National Educational Panel Study" (NEPS) für die deutschen Bundesländer mit ihren erheblichen Unterschieden in der Regelung der Differenzierung.
GESIS
This methodological report on the research project "Recent Immigration Processes and Early Integration Trajectories in Germany" (ENTRA) provides information about the study's research design and data collection. The main objective of the ENTRA project was to collect data on recent immigrants in Germany, covering immigration and settlement dynamics, as well as their integration trajectories. The study consists of a two-wave panel survey of four different immigrant groups: Italians, Poles, Syrians, and Turks. Viewing integration as a mul-tidimensional process, we focused on different aspects of immigrant integration, including language skills and use, ethnic and national identities, ethnic boundaries, political participation, religious belonging and practices, social contacts and networks, educational attainment, labor market participation, and health. The panel study was designed as a multimodal survey that was administered in the national language of the respective immigrant groups. In total, 4,448 immigrants and refugees participated in the first survey wave, and longitudinal data of both panel waves is available for 3,366 cases.
In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), Band 119, Heft 44, S. 1-8
This study explores how researchers' analytical choices affect the reliability of scientific findings. Most discussions of reliability problems in science focus on systematic biases. We broaden the lens to emphasize the idiosyncrasy of conscious and unconscious decisions that researchers make during data analysis. We coordinated 161 researchers in 73 research teams and observed their research decisions as they used the same data to independently test the same prominent social science hypothesis: that greater immigration reduces support for social policies among the public. In this typical case of social science research, research teams reported both widely diverging numerical findings and substantive conclusions despite identical start conditions. Researchers' expertise, prior beliefs, and expectations barely predict the wide variation in research outcomes. More than 95% of the total variance in numerical results remains unexplained even after qualitative coding of all identifiable decisions in each team's workflow. This reveals a universe of uncertainty that remains hidden when considering a single study in isolation. The idiosyncratic nature of how researchers' results and conclusions varied is a previously underappreciated explanation for why many scientific hypotheses remain contested. These results call for greater epistemic humility and clarity in reporting scientific findings.