The purpose of writing this paper is to give a holistic view of farm law and the viewpoint of the legal provisions unveiling them in contrast to existing laws and issues. The paper is divided into three segments wherein the first segment authors discuss the viewpoints of the requirement of this law and how this law passed. In the second segment, the authors unveil the new farms act and its legal provision for comprehending the structure that the government portrays. In the third segment, the authors focused on the interim order of the apex court wherein the real problem about the question of law is still untouched. The outcome of the paper gives an idea about the new farm law and the issues and also existing issues of the present farm laws.
Ram Janmbhoomi (birth place of Lord Rama) is the most controversial dispute of the independent India. The dispute was existing in pre-independence era but after independence dispute has changed the direction and condition of Indian political system. There was claim that mosque was built after the demolition of Ram temple. This dispute was so intense that it brought the incident of demolition of mosque in 1992. After demolition suit was filed from both the side: Muslim and Hindu. The decision of apex court on civil suit came after 27 years. The apex court took the cognizance of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report to decide the claim of parties. This paper aims to give a brief background of Ramjanmbhoomi dispute; explore evidentiary value of expert opinion; whether archaeology is science or art; to evaluate the evidentiary value of archaeological report prepared by ASI through evacuation in the judgement.
Ram Janmbhoomi (birth place of Lord Rama) is the most controversial dispute of the independent India. The dispute was existing in pre-independence era but after independence dispute has changed the direction and condition of Indian political system. There was claim that mosque was built after the demolition of Ram temple. This dispute was so intense that it brought the incident of demolition of mosque in 1992. After demolition suit was filed from both the side: Muslim and Hindu. The decision of apex court on civil suit came after 27 years. The apex court took the cognizance of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report to decide the claim of parties. This paper aims to give a brief background of Ramjanmbhoomi dispute; explore evidentiary value of expert opinion; whether archaeology is science or art; to evaluate the evidentiary value of archaeological report prepared by ASI through evacuation in the judgement. ; Ram Janmbhoomi (lugar de nacimiento del dios Rama) es el objeto de disputa más controvertido de la India independiente. La discusión sobre su pertenencia es anterior a la independencia del país, pero la independencia ha cambiado la dirección y condición del sistema político indio. Por una parte, se alegaba que la mezquita fue construida tras la demolición del templo de Rama. El conflicto llegó a tal nivel de intensidad que provocó la demolición de la mezquita en 1992. Después de este incidente, ambas partes implicadas —musulmanes e hinduistas—, interpusieron sendas demandas. La decisión del Tribunal Supremo sobre esta causa civil tardó 27 años en llegar. El Tribunal Supremo tuvo en cuenta el informe del Servicio Arqueológico de la India para pronunciar su veredicto. El objetivo de este artículo es ofrecer un breve resumen de los antecedentes del conflicto de Ramjanmbhoomi, explorar el valor probatorio de la opinión de los expertos, determinar si la arqueología es una ciencia o un arte, y analizar la fuerza probatoria del informe arqueológico elaborado por el Servicio Arqueológico de la India para la resolución del proceso. ; Ram Janmbhoomi, à savoir le lieu de naissance de Lord Rama, est à la base du litige le plus controversé de l'Inde indépendante. Ce différend existait avant l'indépendance, mais c'est après celle-ci qu'il a modifié en profondeur le système politique indien. Une revendication existait selon laquelle la mosquée avait été construite après la démolition du temple Ram. Le litige était si intense qu'il a entraîné l'incident de la démolition de la mosquée en 1992. À la suite de cette démolition, des poursuites ont été engagées par les deux parties au conflit, à savoir les musulmans et les hindous. La décision de la Cour suprême sur l'action civile est intervenue 27 ans plus tard. La Cour suprême a pris connaissance du rapport des Services archéologiques indiens (ASI) pour prononcer son verdict. Cet article vise à proposer un bref historique de ce conflit du Ramjanmbhoomi, à évaluer la valeur probante de l'opinion des experts, à savoir si l'archéologie est une science ou un art, et enfin à évaluer la qualité de preuve du rapport archéologique préparé par l'ASI dans le cadre de ce jugement. ; Ram Janmbhoomi, a saber, localidade de nascimento de Lord Rama, está na origem do litígio mais controverso da Índia desde a independência do país. Essa contenda existia desde o período colonial, mas foi após a independência que ela alterou profundamente o sistema político indiano. Havia uma reivindicação segundo a qual a mesquita fora construída após a demolição do Templo Ram. O litígio era tão intenso que, em 1992, engendrou o incidente da demolição da mesquita. Em decorrência desta demolição, ações judiciais foram impetradas pelas duas partes em conflito, a saber, muçulmanos e hinduístas. A decisão da Suprema Corte sobre a ação civil ocorreria 27 anos depois. Para pronunciar o seu veredito, a Suprema Corte tomou conhecimento do relatório da Agência Arqueológica da Índia (ASI). Este artigo propõe-se a apresentar um breve histórico do conflito de Ramjanmbhoomi, a avaliar o valor probatório da opinião dos peritos, a saber se a Arqueologia é uma ciência ou uma arte e, por fim, a avaliar a qualidade probatória do relatório arqueológico elaborado pela ASI no âmbito do referido julgamento.
