Suchergebnisse

Discusses the institutionalization of nonracialism discourse in the new South African constitution & the effects of this process in recent efforts to use racialism as a means of uniting subgroups in opposition to the state. In the last stages of apartheid, the Nationalist government instituted selective policies of nonracialism to preserve the power of white elites. Moreover, in the immediate postapartheid period, an article published in the Financial Mail (12 Aug 1994) linked the rise of a black middle class to a discourse of nonracialism, while ignoring the glaring inequality that still existed for most black South Africans. The deployment of nonracialism in this matter is taken to be similar to its use in the US as a gauze to mask inequalities based on race. However, the situation in South Africa is more optimistic than in the US because the black population is a majority in the former &, thus, may avoid being patronized in the manner of African Americans. 1 Photograph, 19 References. Adapted from the source document.

The recent transition to democracy in South Africa has raised expectations about land redistribution. Although much will be done in this regard over the next few years, there will be many claims for the return of land of which people were dispossessed that fall outside the practical guide‐lines laid down by the new state. Since many of these claims will not be frivolous or opportunistic, there is a serious question about how they should be handled. It is not easy to make generalisations; rather, it will be necessary to deal with specific instances on their relative merits. One cannot arrive at a series of ad hocsolutions without regard to their wider implications and the precedents they may set.
This article examines one instance of a claim for the return of lost land. It looks at the land claims advanced by people in Komaggas, one of six communal reserves inhabited by coloured people in the Namaqualand district of the Northern Cape province. One aim is to show that people in Komaggas have a long‐standing, and entirely reasonable, claim to land beyond the current boundary of their reserve; another aim is to illustrate how, and why, people in Komaggas have struggled, and struggle still, to present their claim in a form to which there can readily be a positive response.