Suchergebnisse

The importance of the censorship on the constitutionality of international treaties in the countries is highlighted by the fact that the international treaty is the most significant source of international law which is the core problem in this subject. In terms of the extent of the superiority of international law over internal law and the extent of the treaties' superiority over constitution, and also in terms of ordinary laws and observing the extent of its constitutionality to maintain the principle of superiority of constitution. The subject of censorship on the constitutionality of treaties is of an extreme importance in the protection of the Constitution and the sanctity of its superiority over the international legislation. additionally to that this censorship in its ideal form represents a bulwark against any imposition of state sovereignty and interests. Needless to say that many countries' interests have been threatened and their independence and sovereignty had been touched, because of treaties they have signed. The legal value of an international treaty varies from a constitution to another; in some constitutions it has higher force than the law itself as in France, it is the supreme law of the state, as in the United States and it has the force of law in Egypt.While the Jordanian legislator did not specify a certain position or strength of international treaties, He only specified the competent authority to ratify treaties.

This research aims at highlighting the importance of General Ballot as a necessary political target since the general ballot process is a main principle of democracy where many countries worldwide have integrated it in practice in order to grant its citizens the opportunity to share in power.This research paper has been divided into two sections. The first one examines the general theory of voting rights. This includes its definition, importance, historical background and its legal classifications. The second section discusses the general ballot in comparative laws.The study concludes that the expansion of Electors base has become a vital matter in order to strengthen the democratic process where the increase in using the electorate system shall combat corruption and illegal practices that adversely affect the will of voters.

Constitutions and parliamentary bylaws ensure clarifying the constitutional and legislative mechanisms which a law passes through since the draft until it becomes a valid law. The draft law goes through several constitutional channels, each of which has certain requirements and certain time limits. The Jordanian constitution and the constitutions of the comparison countries have addressed the phases of the legislative process. And what matters in this regard, is the authority of the Head of State in opposing the bills approved by the parliament. This significant instrument illustrates the rank of the head of state and his role in the political system. It's an action that by which the head of state imposes his authority on the well of the parliament and completes the work related to making of law.

This study aims at shedding light on JAB's role in preserving public funds in view of being the top control entity. The other aim is to demonstrate the effect of its role over other public institutions outlined in the Audit Bureau Law No. 28 of 1952 related amendments on improving their performance, realizing the administrative reforms, clarifying the Bureau's relation with the state authorities and importance of its reports in improving the governmental performance. All of this proves its genuineness and importance in combating corruption, maladministration, controlling public funds, assisting the parliament to assume its auditing role and keeping the public informed of the financial and economic situation.

This study aims at taking up the formation of the constitutional court and its jurisdictions. It focuses therefore on the importance of control of the constitutional court in Jordan, and the importance of control over constitutionality of laws; and control over constitutionality of regulations. The Jordanian judiciary, ordinary and administrative, has always exercised its rights as controlling constitutionality of laws through refrainment by applying legislative provisions that violate the constitution. This does not mean that there is a recognized competent constitutional judiciary in the country, where due to its emergence, many calls have brought up to make it under control of an independent body in order to make sure that the public authorities in the state respect superiority of constitution. This has been achieved by the formation of constitutional amendment in 2011 where provisions of the constitution caused establishment of the constitutional court to be responsible for judicial control over constitutionality of laws and regulations. As a result, Constitutional Court Law No. (15) for the year 2012 has been issued. Thus, it has started its task to increase the importance of constitutional legitimacy through being entrusted to carry out this control.