Suchergebnisse

Using data from a 1987 nationwide survey of U.S. cities of 25,000 population and above, this research analyzes the formal authority and the informal powers associated with the office of mayor. We divide cities by mayor-council or council-manager form. The findings confirm that elected chief executives in mayoral cities possess considerably more formal authority than their counterparts in manager communities, yet informal mayoral powers are quite comparable among these two forms of government. Using ANOVA (GLS), we also predict variations in mayoral power using five demographic and political variables. Among mayor-council cities, location in a central city and large size are the best explanatory variables. For manager cities, regional location and the presence of partisan ballots and ward elections are the best predictors of mayoral power. ; Yes ; https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelines

Examines the extent of economic improvement achieved through creation of jobs and investment, hiring and training the disadvantaged, and fostering small business; Kansas City and Cuba, Missouri.

Decentralization of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Small Cities program in 1981 gave states great latitude in deciding how to allocate grant funds. Consequently, scholars expressed concern that, under state control, fewer CDBG funds would be expended for low- & moderate-income benefits via housing rehabilitation. Here, analysis of CDBG expenditures on the Small Cities program in Okla indicates a definite shift in spending priorities. Since 1982, Okla localities diverted CDBG funds primarily to infrastructure & economic development instead of housing-related activities, & channeled a larger amount of dollars into moderate- & median-income areas. As a result, the Small Cities program in Okla, under state control, was found to provide less direct & immediate housing aid to lower-income citizens. 2 Tables.

Using data from a 1987 nationwide survey of U.S. cities of 25,000 population and above, this research analyzes the formal authority and the informal powers associated with the office of mayor. We divide cities by mayor-council or council-manager form. The findings confirm that elected chief executives in mayoral cities possess considerably more formal authority than their counterparts in manager communities, yet informal mayoral powers are quite comparable among these two forms of government. Using ANOVA (GLS), we also predict variations in mayoral power using five demographic and political variables. Among mayor-council cities, location in a central city and large size are the best explanatory variables. For manager cities, regional location and the presence of partisan ballots and ward elections are the best predictors of mayoral power.