Working in a 24/7 Economy: Challenges for American Families. By Harriet B. Presser. New York: Russell Sage, 2003. Pp. xiii+267. $39.95
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 110, Heft 5, S. 1519-1520
ISSN: 1537-5390
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 110, Heft 5, S. 1519-1520
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Teaching sociology: TS, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 522
ISSN: 1939-862X
In: Critical sociology, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 355-369
ISSN: 1569-1632
In this paper, we read college course syllabi as material objects that shed light on larger issues, specifically conflict between faculty and students. We explore the commodification of 'college labor' where degreed labor and credit hours are produced. Under these conditions, the syllabus becomes a labor contract detailing faculty expectations of students. Rather than merely introducing the course subject matter or providing only basic information, the syllabus increasingly spells out the precise conditions under which student work will be evaluated and credit hours awarded, and the behavioral and attitudinal expectations of students. By observing how power is transacted through the syllabus, we better understand the role that faculty/student relations play in further undermining academic community.
In: Sociological focus: quarterly journal of the North Central Sociological Association, Band 32, Heft 3, S. 287-302
ISSN: 2162-1128
In: Annual review of sociology, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 299-322
ISSN: 1545-2115
In this chapter we review research on the division of household labor and its consequences. The review summarizes research focused on issues of measurement, including research on methods of gathering data on housework time and time use in general and discussions of various ways to operationalize the division of household labor. Some attention is paid to historical and theoretical work on housework and women's responsibility for it in particular, followed by a more detailed discussion of current empirical approaches to explaining the division of household labor as well as criticisms of these approaches. Finally, we review research that examines the consequences of the division of household labor, focusing on those studies that examine its impact on labor force participation and wages, marital and family satisfaction, psychological well-being, and perceptions of fairness.
In: Leisure sciences: an interdisciplinary journal, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 45-60
ISSN: 1521-0588
In: Sociological focus: quarterly journal of the North Central Sociological Association, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 265-278
ISSN: 2162-1128
In: Community development journal, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 99-105
ISSN: 1468-2656
In: Journal of Eating Disorders--2050-2974 Vol. 10 Issue. 1 No. 31
Background Eating disorders (EDs) are highly complex mental illnesses associated with significant medical complications. There are currently knowledge gaps in research relating to the epidemiology, aetiology, treatment, burden, and outcomes of eating disorders. To clearly identify and begin addressing the major deficits in the scientific, medical, and clinical understanding of these mental illnesses, the Australian Government Department of Health in 2019 funded the InsideOut Institute (IOI) to develop the Australian Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy, the primary aim of which was to identify priorities and targets for building research capacity and outputs. A series of rapid reviews (RR) were conducted to map the current state of knowledge, identify evidence gaps, and inform development of the national research strategy. Published peer-reviewed literature on DSM-5 listed EDs, across eight knowledge domains was reviewed: (1) population, prevalence, disease burden, Quality of Life in Western developed countries; (2) risk factors; (3) co-occurring conditions and medical complications; (4) screening and diagnosis; (5) prevention and early intervention; (6) psychotherapies and relapse prevention; (7) models of care; (8) pharmacotherapies, alternative and adjunctive therapies; and (9) outcomes (including mortality). While RRs are systematic in nature, they are distinct from systematic reviews in their aim to gather evidence in a timely manner to support decision-making on urgent or high-priority health concerns at the national level. Results Three medical science databases were searched as the primary source of literature for the RRs: Science Direct, PubMed and OVID (Medline). The search was completed on 31st May 2021 (spanning January 2009-May 2021). At writing, a total of 1,320 articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. Conclusions For each RR, the evidence has been organised to review the knowledge area and identify gaps for further research and investment. The series of RRs (published separately within the current series) are designed to support the development of research and translation practice in the field of EDs. They highlight areas for investment and investigation, and provide researchers, service planners and providers, and research funders rapid access to quality current evidence, which has been synthesised and organised to assist decision-making.
BASE