PRS Review: Uganda Case Study
In: Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 2008-09
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 2008-09
SSRN
Working paper
In: Chronic Poverty Research Centre Annotated Bibliographies No. 1
SSRN
Working paper
In: Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 36
SSRN
Working paper
In: Research series no. 80
"The paper examines the comparative advantage of Uganda's exports to the East African Community (EAC) partner states, and how it has evolved during the implementation of the EAC treaty. In addition, the paper seeks to identify commodities that Uganda should specialize in as a basis to enhance the ability to benefit from the special preferential treatment extended to Uganda by China. The paper applies various indices in the measurement of Uganda's Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) on all products at Harmonised System (HS4)-digit product levels. The HS4-digit product level data was obtained from World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS) UNCTAD COMTRADE database." -- Abstract
In: Occasional Paper No. 36 (2014)
SSRN
In: Occasional Paper, No. 14
World Affairs Online
SSRN
Working paper
In: Business strategy and development, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 59-74
ISSN: 2572-3170
AbstractThe paper estimates the likely effects of the AfCFTA on the east african community(EAC) countries. The paper adopts two approaches. First, a trend analysis of the EAC exports and imports to and from the rest of Africa and the world at large using data from the Trade Map database. Second, we use the WITS‐SMART analytical framework. It is established that the EAC countries mainly export agricultural commodities and products, and minerals, which are not likely to be readily imported by the rest of Africa. This is because between 2001 and 2018, the African continent heavily relied on external markets for exports and imports. Therefore, signing the AfCFTA agreement is a welcome step, but it may not necessarily increase EAC trade with the rest of African and intra‐African trade. Results for the trade effects suggest a mixed effect among the EAC countries. All the EAC countries incur tariff revenue losses, although this varies in absolute amounts and proportions. Whereas Uganda and Burundi experience positive welfare effects, Kenya, Tanzania, and Rwanda experience negative welfare effects. The policy implications include: a need to build capacity for production; pursue product diversification and sophistication; innovate and attract investments; adopt high international products standards; and target industrialization as a must.
In: Occasional Paper, No. 13
World Affairs Online