Der Direktanspruch im deutschen und englischen Haftpflichtversicherungsrecht
In: Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung 58
157 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung 58
In: The European journal of the history of economic thought, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 309-310
ISSN: 1469-5936
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 749-756
In: Structural change and economic dynamics, Band 11, Heft 1-2, S. 243-253
ISSN: 1873-6017
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 749-756
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
World Affairs Online
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 749-756
ISSN: 0030-8269, 1049-0965
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 58, Heft 1, S. ii
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Journal of public administration research and theory, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 1-12
ISSN: 1053-1858
In: Public administration review: PAR, Band 55, Heft 5, S. 404
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 45
ISSN: 1467-9221
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 45
ISSN: 0162-895X
In: International journal of public administration, Band 17, Heft 6, S. 1021-1031
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 539-539
In: PS: political science & politics, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 49-51
This note questions both some of the premises and some of the conclusions of Theodore J. Lowi's diagnosis, in the March 1992 American Political Science Review, of the state of the political science discipline. Since I am given a prominent, if undeserved role, in his analysis of historical trends, perhaps I may be pardoned if it begins by refuting that part of his argument.Surely one should feel great (and devilish) delight at learning that one has exercised diabolical influence over the shaping of political science. Alas, I am wholly lacking in the power that Professor Lowi attributes to me in his paper. Alas also, if I were armed, my gun was not aimed in the direction he supposes it was. I am not at all in sympathy with the Third American Government whose (confused) economics-based ideology he presumes I created, as anyone will recognize who has read the foreword to the recent re-issue of the Simon-Smithburg-Thompson textbook, Public Administration, or the earlier work, Administrative Behavior (AB), or the more recent Reason in Human Affairs. Are these books written so obscurely that Professor Lowi could not see that the rationality celebrated in them (if any rationality is celebrated at all) is a weak, muddled, bounded rationality that is rejected out of hand by the economists who espouse public choice and neoclassical laissez-faire theory?