Occupation for hire: Private military companies and their role in Iraq
In: The RUSI journal: publication of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, Band 149, Heft 3, S. 68-71
ISSN: 1744-0378
7 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The RUSI journal: publication of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, Band 149, Heft 3, S. 68-71
ISSN: 1744-0378
In: The RUSI journal: independent thinking on defence and security, Band 149, Heft 3, S. 68-71
ISSN: 0307-1847
World Affairs Online
In: The RUSI journal: independent thinking on defence and security, Band 149, Heft 3, S. 68-71
ISSN: 0307-1847
In: Review of African political economy, Band 16, Heft 45-46
ISSN: 1740-1720
Unfree Labour and its Persistence into the Capitalist Era: A Critical Review of Recent Books by Robert Miles and Robin Cohen reviewed by Bob Currie The New Helots: Migrants in the International Division of Labourby Robin Cohen; Capitalism and Unfree Labour: Anomaly or Neccessity?by Robert Miles.
War and Society: The Militarisation of South Africaby Jacklyn Cock & Laurie Nathan (Eds); David Phillip, Cape Town, 1989
Coping with Rapid Urban Growth in Africa: An Annotated Bibliography in English and French on Policy and Management of Urban Affairs in the 1980sby Richard Stren with Claire Letemendia, translated by Claude Stren. Bibliography Series no.12, Centre for Developing Area Studies, McGill University, Montreal, 1986
World Affairs Online
Soon after the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV), was first identified in a cluster of patients with pneumonia (Li et al., 2020), in the Chinese city of Wuhan on 31 December 2019, rapid human to human transmission was anticipated (Hui et al., 2020). The fast pace of transmission is wreaking havoc and stirring media hype and public health concern (Ippolito et al., 2020) globally. When the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the disease, (now officially named COVID-19) a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on 31st January 2020 (WHO, 2020a), the Director General Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus justified the decision by stating that WHOs greatest concern was the potential for the virus to spread to countries with weaker health systems. Repeated outbreaks of other preventable emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases with epidemic potential have taken their toll on the health systems of many African countries. The devastating 2014–2016 Ebola Virus Epidemic (WHO, 2020b) in West Africa, demonstrated how ill-prepared the affected countries were to rapidly identify the infection and halt transmission (WHO, 2020d, Largent, 2016, Hoffman and Silverberg, 2018, Omoleke et al., 2016). Similarly, the smoldering remnants of the 2018–19 Ebola Virus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, have demonstrated even for health services with considerable experience of dealing with a certain emerging pathogen, geography and sociopolitical instability, can hamper the response (Aruna et al., 2019).
BASE
BACKGROUND: To mitigate SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks from international air travellers, many countries implemented a combination of up to 14 days of self-quarantine upon arrival plus PCR testing in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of quarantine and testing of international travellers to reduce risk of onward SARS-CoV-2 transmission into a destination country in the pre-COVID-19 vaccination era. METHODS: We used a simulation model of air travellers arriving in the United Kingdom from the European Union or the United States, incorporating timing of infection stages while varying quarantine duration and timing and number of PCR tests. RESULTS: Quarantine upon arrival with a PCR test on day 7 plus a 1-day delay for results can reduce the number of infectious arriving travellers released into the community by a median 94% (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 89–98) compared with a no quarantine/no test scenario. This reduction is similar to that achieved by a 14-day quarantine period (median > 99%; 95% UI: 98–100). Even shorter quarantine periods can prevent a substantial amount of transmission; all strategies in which travellers spend at least 5 days (mean incubation period) in quarantine and have at least one negative test before release are highly effective (median reduction 89%; 95% UI: 83–95)). CONCLUSION: The effect of different screening strategies impacts asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals differently. The choice of an optimal quarantine and testing strategy for unvaccinated air travellers may vary based on the number of possible imported infections relative to domestic incidence.
BASE