Increasing children's and young people's participation in decisions, about their own care and about service development, is a policy priority. Although in general participation is increasing, disabled children are less likely to be involved than non‐disabled children and it is unclear to what extent children with complex needs or communication impairments are being included in participation activities. This article presents research exploring factors to support good practice in participation and discusses policy and practice implications.
ABSTRACTThe Integrated Children's System (ICS) is premised on a single approach to assessment/review, ideally providing a more coherent, comprehensive and efficient system of electronic information recording and sharing among different groups of practitioners. Despite its holistic aims for all children in need, questions have been raised about the use of ICS with certain groups of children, especially those who do not follow normative patterns, such as disabled children. This paper explores the introduction of ICS with disabled children and their families within four pilot authorities in England and Wales. Drawing on interviews and questionnaires with 16 social workers and 22 families experiencing assessment/reviews under the new ICS, this paper suggests that important questions and concerns regarding the appropriateness and usefulness for disabled children of the ICS remain, especially the use of 'standardized' exemplars. Five disability‐specific areas of concern are identified, and their implications are considered.
A literature review was carried out to establish what evidence exists about disabled children's participation in decision‐making, both regarding their own lives and about the shape of service delivery. There is evidence that disabled children hold and can express views, given the right environment. However, participation of disabled children needs further development. Measures proposed include addressing organisational systems so that they promote participation, extending advocacy services, the adoption of inclusive approaches and staff training, plus education and information for disabled children and their parents. There remain significant gaps in the research evidence available.
Changes over time in the pattern of behaviour problems shown by 91 children with Down's syndrome, together with maternal appraisal of the seriousness of reported problems, were investigated through questionnaires completed by mothers. Fifty‐four individual behaviours were studied at mean ages 9 years 2 months and 13 years 9 months. There was a significant decline in the overall frequency of behaviour problems and in some disturbed behaviours, sleeping and toileting problems, and over‐activity. Only one problem‐lying‐became more common. However, many problems were found to be persistent among the same children.While mothers viewed relatively few behaviours as definite problems, a minority faced a multiplicity of perceived problems at both points in time. Running away was a common problem which particularly concerned mothers. Sleeping problems were generally seen as less problematic by Time 2, while stealing had become more so. Some individual problems were associated with the gender, age and developmental level of the children. Results suggest that behaviour problems may become set relatively early in life, and that families may benefit from help in preventing and dealing with problems well before the teenage years.
To date, little attention has been paid to the appropriateness of the Every Child Matters (ECM) outcomes framework to disabled children.1 This article reports findings from a research project which sought the views of disabled children and their parents about their desired outcomes. Twenty‐nine children and 90 parents were interviewed. The findings indicate that ECM outcomes are appropriate to disabled children but can have different meanings. In addition, the need to recognise the importance of maintaining outcomes, as well as progress, is highlighted.
This paper examines the sleep disruption experienced by 36 families of technology‐dependent children living at home in the United Kingdom. The paper begins with an overview of the qualitative study in which parents' experiences of sleep disruption emerged as a major theme. We then describe the nature of and reasons for the sleep disruption, the help families received with care overnight, and the effects of sleep disruption on parents in particular. This is followed by discussion of the implications of the findings for policy and practice as well as future research.
ABSTRACTThe families of 118 children with Down's syndrome, aged from six to fourteen years, took part in a study which sought to clarify the relationships between a large number of descriptor variables and a range of child and parental outcome measures. Previous studies had suggested that socio‐economic factors may be related to both child and parental outcomes, and a number of such variables were included in the present study.By using multiple regression analysis, it was possible to discriminate between single variable associations and those which remained significant when other associated variables were taken into account. In this way, parental educational qualifications were found to be associated with the children's IQ and mental age scores, and with the extent to which they participated in organised activities. Social class was related to the extent of the children's play contacts and to changes in their mental age scores. More specific aspects of social and economic disadvantage, such as inadequate housing and finance, unemployment, and lack of a car, were related to child behaviour problems and to measures of parental stress and satisfaction. Mothers in manual social classes were more likely to have increasing levels of stress.The implications of these findings for service providers are discussed.