Suchergebnisse

The Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia is not known to other parties, other than to law enforcement officers who represent victims (Investigators or Public Prosecutors), suspects (Legal advisors) and Judges. However, in civil law, there are known other parties who are interested in entering into a dispute known as intervient. The idea of a third party that has an interest in the realm of civil law is made into the forerunner of a third party in criminal procedural law in Indonesia. Against such conditions in criminal law known as the term "Amicus Curiae" or often referred to as "Friends of Court" or in Indonesian is known as "Friends of the Court". Regarding how the existence and opportunities for the implementation of "Amicus Curiae" in the Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia in the future that will come will be assessed by normative methods with conceptual, historical, and legislative approaches. Keywords: Amicus Curiae; Criminal Procedure Code; Criminal Proof System

Prior to the 1990s, there was no agency that managed Batur tourism objects and resources. In 2017 a tourism area management body was formed, but at that time its authority was limited to the imposition of levies for tourists visiting the Geopark tourism area. It is not clear which agency has the authority to organize tourism areas, so a problem arises: The agency authorized to organize tourism areas and the factors that affect the arrangement of tourism areas. This research aims as evaluation materials in arrangement the Batur Unesco Global Geopark Tourism Area in Bangli Regency The research method used is empirical legal research. The analysis techniques that will be used are Legal-Content Analysis and Futuristic Analysis. This legal research aims to analyze the problem, namely the agency authorized to organize the Batur UNESCO Global Geopark tourism area in Bangli Regency. The authority of the management body is limited only in collecting fees, whereas for a significant increase, the authority of the agency is not only to collect tourist fees, but also to organize the area to increase its tourist attractiveness. The results of the discussion of the regulation of the authority for structuring tourism areas are the Bali KSDA and the Bangli Regional Government, as well as the not yet implemented regional arrangement based on natural preservation, community empowerment, and environmental economic progress. Meanwhile, the conclusions and suggestions are that the Management Agency has not yet been authorized to organize tourism areas. Factors that influence the structuring of the tourism area are the substance of the Bangli regional regulation, concerning households, local law enforcers, and the legal culture of the local community. Suggestions that the tourism area management body should be changed to Perumda. Law enforcement must have synergy between the Bangli Regional Government and the Bali BKSDA.