Suchergebnisse

Esse artigo tem como objetivo elucidar as relações de poder (imbricações discursivas, práticas políticas e subjetividades) que estão sendo configuradas e reconfiguradas desde a metade do século 20 no que concerne a paz, o humanitarismo, a resiliência e o neoliberalismo. A metodologia aplicada aqui é a "etnografia de documentos", desenvolvida por Annelise Riles, que considera documentos como categoria analítica e orientação metodológica. Dessa forma, o artigo se divide nas seguintes seções: i) revisão de literatura relevante sobre o humanitarismo para situar o artigo com o debate atual; ii) discursos de paz humanitarista que vem emergindo desde a metade do século 20; iii) sujeitos de paz humanitarista que emergem no domínio de paz humanitarista, tais quais o sujeito neoliberal, resiliente e adaptativo e o sujeito de direito, ainda a espera. Ao apresentar essa dinâmica de relações de poder desse novo domínio de paz humanitarista, vinculado ao humanitarismo, resiliência e neoliberalismo, nós buscamos explorar como a violência, a desigualdade e o abandono acabam sendo reproduzidos nesse processo, de modo que possamos ajudar a refletir a respeito do estado atual dos direitos humanos e como avançar nessa temática.

Esse artigo tem como objetivo elucidar as relações de poder (imbricações discursivas, práticas políticas e subjetividades) que estão sendo configuradas e reconfiguradas desde a metade do século 20 no que concerne a paz, o humanitarismo, a resiliência e o neoliberalismo. A metodologia aplicada aqui é a "etnografia de documentos", desenvolvida por Annelise Riles, que considera documentos como categoria analítica e orientação metodológica. Dessa forma, o artigo se divide nas seguintes seções: i) revisão de literatura relevante sobre o humanitarismo para situar o artigo com o debate atual; ii) discursos de paz humanitarista que vem emergindo desde a metade do século 20; iii) sujeitos de paz humanitarista que emergem no domínio de paz humanitarista, tais quais o sujeito neoliberal, resiliente e adaptativo e o sujeito de direito, ainda a espera. Ao apresentar essa dinâmica de relações de poder desse novo domínio de paz humanitarista, vinculado ao humanitarismo, resiliência e neoliberalismo, nós buscamos explorar como a violência, a desigualdade e o abandono acabam sendo reproduzidos nesse processo, de modo que possamos ajudar a refletir a respeito do estado atual dos direitos humanos e como avançar nessa temática.Recebido em: abril/2018.Aprovado em: março/2019. ; This article intends to shed light on how relations of power (the imbrication of discourses, political practices and subjects) are being configured and re-configured since the mid-20th century in relation to peace, humanitarianism, resilience and neoliberalism. The methodology applied here is the "ethnography of documents", developed by Annelise Riles, which considers the document as an analytical category and a methodological orientation. Therefore, the article is divided by the following subsections: i) relevant background literature on humanitarianism in order to situate the article with the current debate; ii) humanitarian peace discourses emerging in the mid 20th century, focusing on documents such as the Charter of the United Nations (1945), the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the Human Development Report (1994); iii) humanitarian peace subjects that emerge in the humanitarian domain of peace: the neoliberal, resilient and adaptive subject and the rights holder subject, still waiting. By presenting the power dynamics of a new domain of peace, linked to humanitarianism, resilience and neoliberalism, we also engage on exploring how violence, inequality and abandonment are (re)produced in this process, so that it can help improving a work-in-progress by reflecting on the current state of human rights.

Abstract This article discusses how Operation Acolhida, within the context of the Venezuela Situation, functions as a customized politics of hope where the Venezuelans refugees and migrants crossing the Brazilian border's need for hope of is instrumentalized in a strategy to define how/what to hope for. The methodology is divided in the following subsections: the first section brings the discussion on the metaphysics of presence and its logocentric and teleologic perspectives; section two discusses how theories and understanding of hope have been evolving from the Ancient Greek thinkers till the present day and presents the politics of hope as a tool to understand the Operation Acolhida. The last two sections draw its conclusions by analysing how Operation Acolhida activates a customized strategy.

Based on a state policy perspective, this paper seeks to present the path of Brazil's participation in United Nations (UN) peace operations, from its genesis in 1947 to the present day, with the intent to comprehend whether there is a progressive and evolutionary pattern in these engagement efforts, and which would be the main challenges, contributions and future orientations to the country in this matter. To this end, in a first moment, the text will bring a conceptual discussion regarding the different definitions and understandings on peace operations. Subsequently, we will analyze the evolution of UN peace operations throughout its 70 years and the Brazilian positions during this period. In a third moment, we will present final considerations, identifying the upcoming challenges and the main possible perspectives for Brazil to engage in future peace operations. The intention, therefore, is to ascertain whether peacekeeping operations, as an instrument of international politics aligned to the guidelines of Brazilian defense and foreign policies, should continue to be supported by Brazil or if new reorientations are necessary as a national strategy.

Based on a state policy perspective, this paper presents the path of Brazil's participation in U.N. peace operations, from its genesis in 1947 to the present day, with the intent to comprehend if there is in fact a progressive and evolutionary pattern in the participation of Brazil in peacekeeping, and which would be the challenges, contributions and future orientations to the country in this matter. For that, in a first moment, the text will bring a conceptual discussion regarding the different definitions and understandings on peacekeeping operations. Subsequently, we will analyze the evolution of UN peacekeeping operations throughout its 70 years and the Brazilian positions during this period. In a third moment, we will present the final considerations identifying the upcoming challenges and the main possible perspectives for Brazil to engage in future peacekeeping operations. The intention, therefore, is to ascertain whether peacekeeping operations, as an instrument of international policy aligned to the guidelines of Brazilian defense policy and foreign policy, should continue to be supported by Brazil or if new reorientations are necessary as a national strategy.