Invading the void: social time production as a developmental tool in the late Soviet periphery
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 65, Heft 1, S. 52-71
ISSN: 2375-2475
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Canadian Slavonic papers: an interdisciplinary journal devoted to Central and Eastern Europe, Band 65, Heft 1, S. 52-71
ISSN: 2375-2475
In: Futures, Band 135, S. 102875
In: Laboratorium: žurnal socialʹnych issledovanij = Laboratorium : Russian review of social research, Band 12, Heft 3
ISSN: 2078-1938
In: Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 39/EC/2013
SSRN
Working paper
In: Politija: analiz, chronika, prognoz ; žurnal političeskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki = Politeía, Band 61, Heft 2, S. 128-141
ISSN: 2587-5914
In: Politija: analiz, chronika, prognoz ; žurnal političeskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki = Politeía, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 152-162
ISSN: 2587-5914
In: Politija: analiz, chronika, prognoz ; žurnal političeskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki = Politeía, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 167-168
ISSN: 2587-5914
In: Foresight: the journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 305-319
ISSN: 1465-9832
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to develop an integrated approach to evaluating corporate foresight (CF) studies at all stages of its implementation and to test this approach using the example of a Russian state-owned corporation.
Design/methodology/approach
The use of foresight by companies as a part of their strategic activities is growing but still rather limited. To increase the effectiveness of foresight at the corporate level and ensure its justification, special approaches and criteria for its evaluation should be developed. To develop the approach to evaluation of CF which would be useful at all stages of foresight realization, at first, the authors focused the authors' attention on identification of main challenges, problem and barriers, which arise during foresight process on the one hand, and exploring success factors and lessons learnt from different case studies on the other hand. On the basis of this literature analysis, the authors have formed a long list of evaluation criteria, which reflect accumulated experience in the field and all-important aspects to make foresight project successful and effective. On the next step, the authors related these criteria with stages of foresight realization and evaluation category. For pilot testing of this methodology, the authors used a case of Russian state-owned corporation.
Findings
This paper has presented an integrated approach to the evaluation of CF projects. The logic of the evaluation process of CF at all stages of its implementation is proposed; key evaluation topics (concept, objectives, project team, design of the project, project methodology, stakeholders, implementation, resources, results and its dissemination, effects and impact and barriers) are identified, and the corresponding sets of criteria are formed.
Originality/value
The originality of the work lies in using a wide experience of national foresight studies evaluation for corporations. The suggested approach could be used as a framework for CF evaluation. It was tested on the Russian state-owned company RussX.
In: Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 243/EC/2021
SSRN
Working paper
In: Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 241/EC/2020
SSRN
Working paper
In: International Organisations Research Journal, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 40-57
ISSN: 1996-7845
In: Foresight: the journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 75-91
ISSN: 1465-9832
Purpose–The aim of this paper is to identify ways for improvement of the foresight evaluation framework on the basis of analysis and systematisation of accumulated experience in the field of project management.Design/methodology/approach–The paper is based on a detailed literature review devoted to an evaluation of foresight and traditional projects. The approaches to project evaluation in the field of project management were investigated, and the main steps of traditional project evaluation process were determined. The most commonly applied steps of foresight evaluation were identified by the analysis of recent foresight evaluation projects. The comparison of evaluation frameworks for foresight projects and traditional projects allows to provide recommendations for foresight evaluation framework improvement.Findings–The paper identifies several lessons for foresight evaluation from project management. The elements which can enrich foresight evaluation framework are the following: the development of an evaluation model; the extensive use of quantitative methods; the elaboration of evaluation scales; the inclusion of economic indicators into evaluation; and the provision of more openness and transparency for evaluation results.Originality/value–Given the importance of foresight evaluation procedures and the lack of a commonly applied methodological approach, the value of this paper consists in identifying a foresight evaluation framework and enriching it with elements of project management.
In: Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future, S. 11-30
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 11966
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of development economics, Band 153, S. 102741
ISSN: 0304-3878