Implementing Global Anti-Bribery Norms from the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention to the U.N. Convention Against Corruption
In: Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, Band 23, S. 1
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, Band 23, S. 1
SSRN
In: 53 Virginia. Journal of International Law 1 (2012)
SSRN
In: 39 Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce 249 (2012)
SSRN
In: Minnesota Journal of International Law, Band 18
SSRN
In: Hofstra Law Review, Band 38, S. 163
SSRN
In: Hofstra Law Review, Band 38
SSRN
This Article examines the most notorious Chinese internet defamation case, Wang Hong v. Maxstation, which awarded substantial damages against an individual consumer as well as two online magazines for criticizing a laptop product on the internet. The case created a widespread political controversy on the internet in China, highlighting an underlying tension in the current policies of the Chinese government, which promotes a more open market economy while maintaining tight censorship over public speech. The case developed landmark legal doctrine in China, extending judge made defamation law while ignoring the Chinese consumer protection statute. Extending defamation doctrine to include factual omissions as evidence of falsity substantially departs from prior Chinese law creating serious conflicts with defamation law in other countries. Allowing a corporation to recover for insult and injured feelings, regardless of the truth of the underlying claims, and without recognizing some exception for opinion or fair comment, departs very substantially from defamation law in other WTO jurisdictions, where truth is an absolute defense to defamation, and expression of opinion/fair comment derogatory language about products by consumers is more widely tolerated. The case cannot be viewed historically as a successful application of rule "according to" law, given that the decisions ignore the relevant statute. The case may stand for an early example of rule "of' law in which Supreme People's Court Interpretations are given precedence over statutes.
BASE
In: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Band 39
SSRN
In: 15 Me. L. Rev. 255, 1998
SSRN
In: New England Law Review, Band 32
SSRN
In: 27 Environmental Law 1295 (1997)
SSRN
In: American University Law Review, Band 44
SSRN
In: 1 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 17 (1992)
SSRN
SSRN
In: 71 Georgetown Law Journal 119 (1982)
SSRN