Suchergebnisse
Filter
35 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Reasoning v. Rhetoric: The Strange Case of "Unconstitutional Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"
In: Rutgers Law Review, Band 74
SSRN
'Unconstitutional Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' – A Misleading Mantra that Should Be Gone for Good
In: Washington Law Review Online, Band 96, S. 1
SSRN
Be Careful What You Wish for: Private Political Parties, Public Primaries, and State Constitutional Restrictions
Political parties always disliked the Progressive Era changes that pulled the entire electorate into nominating candidates. Why, after all, should non-party members participate in the affairs and choices of private organizations? Over the course of a century, Democrats, Republicans, and minor parties repeatedly mounted lawsuits to attack new primary laws, and they eventually prevailed on a key constitutional issue: the First Amendment right of association. But when political actors access the courts for strategic purposes, they can get caught in the vagaries of history and public attitudes, with outcomes they might not like. This Essay focuses on the history of Washington State's "direct primary" and "blanket primary" systems, the repeated lawsuits challenging them, and the freedom of association doctrine that propelled the blanket primary's 2004 demise. It then recounts the blowback from Washington voters, who enacted a "top two" primary system that sidelined the political parties by sending the two highest vote-getters to the general election regardless of political affiliation. It asserts that remaining aspects of Washington's election system might violate the State's own constitution, and that things could get worse than ever for the parties, perhaps disrupting precinct officer elections and even the state's presidential primary. How did the political parties wind up at odds with their own voters, with an outcome opposite to what they intended? This Essay suggests that the answer lies in a web of conflicts: between litigation and political strategies; between the federal and state constitutions; and between the First Amendment's protections of freedom of association, the late nineteenth century populist constitutional ban on public assistance to private entities, and the early twentieth century progressive goal of forcing private political parties to open their processes to the voting public. It concludes that long-term litigation strategies to address political issues can fail to achieve their objectives ...
BASE
Be Careful What You Wish For: Private Political Parties, Public Primaries, and State Constitutional Restrictions
In: Washington Law Review, Band 94, Heft 2, S. 823-50
SSRN
Decentralization: How a Hidden Provision in the U.S. Constitution Could Remake America
In: NWLawyer, Band 72, Heft 3
SSRN
Model Rule 5.7 and Lawyers in Government Jobs - How Can They Ever Be 'Non-Lawyers'?
In: Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 45-72
SSRN
Realigning the Governmental/Proprietary Distinction in Municipal Law
Lawyers and judges who deal with municipal law are perpetually puzzled by the distinction between "governmental" and "proprietary" powers of local governments. The distinction is murky, inconsistent between jurisdictions, inconsistent within jurisdictions, and of limited use in predicting how courts will rule. Critics have launched convincing attacks on the division of municipal powers into these two categories. Most articles have focused on problems with the distinction in specific areas of municipal law. In contrast, this article provides a comprehensive analysis of the governmental/proprietary distinction in seven specific doctrinal areas: legislative grants of municipal authority, government contracts, torts, eminent domain, adverse possession, zoning, and taxation. The article concludes that confusion with the governmental/proprietary distinction will be materially reduced if local government powers are conceptually realigned. Instead of completely jettisoning the distinction, as some have proposed, the "governmental" category should be split in two, with coercive and policymaking powers like the police power, law enforcement, and the powers of taxation, eminent domain and budgeting constituting a "governmental sovereign powers" category. General services that economists call public goods should be detached from the governmental sovereign powers and regrouped with proprietary services like municipal utilities to create a category of "governmental service activities." The article evaluates the new groupings within the context of each of seven substantive areas of law where the governmental/proprietary distinction has been used. The article concludes that realigning local government powers will reduce analytical confusion and help legislators and judges when they make key choices in both the lawmaking and litigation context.
BASE
Realigning the Governmental/Proprietary Distinction in Municipal Law
In: Seattle University Law Review, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 173-215
SSRN
Home Rule' vs. 'Dillon's Rule' for Washington Cities
In: Seattle University Law Review, Band 38, Heft 3, S. 809-60
SSRN
Revisiting the Client Conundrum: Whom Does Lawyer for a Government Represent, and Who Gives Direction to that Governmental Lawyer?
In: Washington State Association of Municipal Attorneys Spring Conference, 2015
SSRN
Working paper
Ethics Issues in Representing Intergovernmental Entities
In: University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-15
SSRN
Working paper
Pivoting to Progressivism: Justice Stephen J. Chadwick, the Washington Supreme Court, and Change in Early 20th-Century Judicial Reasoning and Rhetoric
In: Pacific Northwest Quarterly, Band 104, Heft 3, S. 107-21
SSRN
Polyphonic Federalism: Toward the Protection of Fundamental Rights, by Robert A. Schapiro
In: Publius: the journal of federalism, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 563-563
ISSN: 0048-5950
Washington: The Past and Present Populist State
Describes the impact of the late-nineteenth century populist movement on the structure and content of Washington's constitution and the consequential impact on the state's political and legal life. Suggests that the anti-business attitudes and skepticism about government prevalent among Washington State residents in the 1880s and 1890s, continues to influence that state's constitution, laws and politics today. ; https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-chapters/1020/thumbnail.jpg
BASE