Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Cyber security, community, time; 2. Towards a politics of time; 3. Diagnosing the present; 4. Imagining the future; 5. Arguing through the past; 6. Inhabiting the future; 7. Cyber security and the politics of time; 8. Conclusion
In: Stevens, T. in War with shadows: Persistent engagement and the power-topologies of US military cyberspace operations. In S. Matviyenko and K. Hilstob, eds. Cyberwar Topologies: In Struggle for a Post-American Internet (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), Forthcoming
In: Stevens, T. (2021) United Kingdom: Pragmatism and adaptability in the cyber realm. In S.N. Romaniuk and M. Manjikian, eds., Routledge Companion to Global Cyber-Security Strategy (London: Routledge), pp. 191-200.
AbstractCybersecurity protects citizens and society from harm perpetrated through computer networks. Its task is made ever more complex by the diversity of actors—criminals, spies, militaries, hacktivists, firms—operating in global information networks, so that cybersecurity is intimately entangled with the so-called grey zone of conflict between war and peace in the early twenty-first century. To counter cyber threats from this environment, cybersecurity is turning to artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI) to mitigate anomalous behaviours in cyberspace. This article argues that AI algorithms create new modes and sites of cybersecurity knowledge production through hybrid assemblages of humans and nonhumans. It concludes by looking beyond 'everyday' cybersecurity to military and intelligence use of AI and asks what is at stake in the automation of cybersecurity.
In: Stevens, T. (2019) Global code: Power and the weak regulation of cyberweapons. In N. Hynek, O. Ditrych and V. Stritecky, eds., Regulating Global Security: Insights from Conventional and Unconventional Regimes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 271-295.
In: Stevens, T. (2019) Strategic cyberterrorism: Problems of ends, ways and means. In D.M. Jones, P. Schulte, C. Ungerer and M.L.R. Smith, eds., Handbook of Terrorism and Counter Terrorism Post 9/11 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 42-52.
This thematic issue advocates a range of novel theoretical and methodological directions applicable to cybersecurity studies. Drawing on critical International Relations theory, Science and Technology Studies, participant observation, quantitative political science, and other social science methods and theory, the contributors advance modes of invigorating the exploration of cybersecurity as an assemblage of sociotechnical practices. In so doing, this issue seeks to enhance understanding of the politics and strategies of cybersecurity, one of the most complex and diverse technical and political challenges of our contemporary world.
John H. Herz (1908-2005) is better known for his theorisation of the security dilemma than for his conviction that human survival is threatened by the conditions of late modernity. This article explores extinction and survival in his work to interrogate his persistent characterisation as an incorrigible pessimist. In his preoccupation with extinction, Herz would seem a first-rank pessimist, but his intellectual commitments belie this easy categorisation. Specifically, his appeals to interdisciplinary 'survival research' suggest a qualified pessimism that does not foreclose on the potential of humankind to overcome structural, political and normative obstacles. This is consistent with current understandings of pessimism within the broader realist tradition. Herz expressed an 'open' and 'linear' temporality that challenges cyclical and linear-progressive temporalities inherent to realism and liberalism, respectively. Herz articulates, therefore, a 'productive pessimism' that charts a different path for pessimist thought beyond its pejorative connotations. This article contributes to the literature on classical realism, to a growing interest in Herz's intellectual legacy, and to the developing appreciation of time and temporality in International Relations theory and practice. It also provides a foundation for rethinking our assumptions about pessimism and international politics.
This thematic issue advocates a range of novel theoretical and methodological directions applicable to cybersecurity studies. Drawing on critical International Relations theory, Science and Technology Studies, participant observation, quantitative political science, and other social science methods and theory, the contributors advance modes of invigorating the exploration of cybersecurity as an assemblage of sociotechnical practices. In so doing, this issue seeks to enhance understanding of the politics and strategies of cybersecurity, one of the most complex and diverse technical and political challenges of our contemporary world.
In: Stevens , T 2018 , ' Global cybersecurity : New directions in theory and methods ' , Politics and Governance , vol. 6 , no. 2 , pp. 1-4 . https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1569
This thematic issue advocates a range of novel theoretical and methodological directions applicable to cybersecurity studies. Drawing on critical International Relations theory, Science and Technology Studies, participant observation, quantitative political science, and other social science methods and theory, the contributors advance modes of invigorating the exploration of cybersecurity as an assemblage of sociotechnical practices. In so doing, this issue seeks to enhance understanding of the politics and strategies of cybersecurity, one of the most complex and diverse technical and political challenges of our contemporary world.
In: Stevens , T 2018 , ' Cyberweapons : Power and the governance of the invisible ' , International Politics , vol. 55 , no. 3-4 , pp. 482-502 . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0088-y
This article explores the non-emergence of a global governance regime for cyberweapons. Cyberweapons are malicious software entities deployed to cause harm to adversaries' computer networks and systems. They threaten the integrity and functionality of digital systems that enable global circuits of communication and exchange, with significant potential impacts on social, economic and political order. Using a power-analytical approach, this article identifies four areas in which power works to constrain regime formation: the productive power of NATO's Tallinn Manual Process; the structural power of US involvement in cyberweapons markets; the institutional power of Internet technologies; and diplomatic claims to sovereignty that mask the operations of compulsory power. These work together to prevent a unified global approach to the regulation of cyberweapons. The article concludes that there are substantial obstacles to effective cyberweapons governance but that these should not prevent ongoing efforts to tackle this important and ubiquitous security issue.
In: Stevens , T 2018 , ' Exeunt omnes? Survival, pessimism and time in the work of John H. Herz ' , Millennium Journal of International Studies , vol. 46 , no. 3 , pp. 283-302 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818769414
John H. Herz (1908-2005) is better known for his theorisation of the security dilemma than for his conviction that human survival is threatened by the conditions of late modernity. This article explores extinction and survival in his work to interrogate his persistent characterisation as an incorrigible pessimist. In his preoccupation with extinction, Herz would seem a first-rank pessimist, but his intellectual commitments belie this easy categorisation. Specifically, his appeals to interdisciplinary 'survival research' suggest a qualified pessimism that does not foreclose on the potential of humankind to overcome structural, political and normative obstacles. This is consistent with current understandings of pessimism with the broader realist tradition. Herz expressed an 'open' and 'linear' temporality that challenges cyclical and linear-progressive temporalities inherent to realism and liberalism, respectively. Herz articulates, therefore, a 'productive pessimism' that charts a different path for pessimist thought beyond its pejorative connotations. This article contributes to the literature on classical realism, to a growing interest in Herz's intellectual legacy, and to the developing appreciation of time and temporality in International Relations theory and practice. It also provides a foundation for rethinking our assumptions about pessimism and international politics.