Suchergebnisse
Filter
92 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Voting Machines: Friend or Foe?
In: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper 2024-3
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
How Valid are Voter Registration Statistics? A Demographic Approach for Assessing the Validity of EAVS Voter Registration Data
In: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2019-3
SSRN
Working paper
Too Large, Too Small, or Just Right? Assessing the Growth of Voter Registration Rates Since the NVRA
In: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2019-28
SSRN
Working paper
A Voter's Eye View of Elections, 2008-2016
SSRN
Working paper
The Elections Performance Index: Past, Present, and Future
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
Is the EAVS a Reliable Guide to Voter List Maintenance?
In: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2018-20
SSRN
Working paper
Electoral Vulnerabilities in the United States: Past, Present, and Future
In: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2017-5
SSRN
Working paper
Waiting to Vote in 2012
In: The Journal of law & [and] politics, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 439-464
ISSN: 0749-2227
SSRN
Working paper
A Voter's Eye View of the 2012 Election
In: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2019-30
SSRN
Working paper
The Value of Committee Assignments in Congress Since 1994
In: Midwest Political Science Association, 2012
SSRN
Voting Technologies
In: Annual review of political science, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 353-378
ISSN: 1545-1577
A renewed, energetic interest in voting technologies erupted in political science following the 2000 presidential election. Spawned initially by the recount controversy in Florida, the literature has grown to consider the effects of voting technologies on the vote choice more generally. This literature has explained why localities have the voting technologies (lever machines, punch cards, etc.) they use. Although there are racial differences in the distribution of voting technologies used across localities, the strongest explanations for why local jurisdictions use particular technologies rest on legacies of past decisions. The bulk of the voting technology literature has focused on explaining how voting technologies influence residual votes, that is, blank, undervoted, and overvoted ballots. With the relative homogenization of voting technology since 2000, prospects for research that examines the effects of different machines on residual votes seem limited. However, opportunities exist to study the effect of voting machines historically, the effect of voting technologies on down-ballot rates, and the role of interest groups in affecting which voting technologies are made available to voters.