Suchergebnisse
Filter
24 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Emerging Issues in Cannabis Law: 2022 and Beyond
In: Seton Hall Legislative Journal, Band 46, Heft 3
SSRN
Equity in Cannabis Agriculture
In: Boston University Law Review, Band 101, Heft 3
SSRN
Coastline Non-Conformism
In: University of Hawai'i Law Review, Band 42, Heft 1
SSRN
From the Clean Power Plan to the Affordable Clean Energy Rule: How Regulated Entities Adapt to Regulatory Change and Uncertainty
In: Hofstra Law Review, Band 47, Heft 3
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
Comparative Cannabis: Approaches to Marijuana Agriculture Regulation in the United States and Canada
In: McGeorge Law Review, Band 49, Heft 2 .
SSRN
Weed and Water Law: Regulating Legal Marijuana
In: 67 Hastings Law Journal 3, (2016)
SSRN
Marijuana Agriculture Law: Regulation at the Root of an Industry
In: Florida Law Review, Band 69, Heft 2, S. 2017
SSRN
Marijuana Appellations: The Case for Cannabicultural Designations of Origin
In: Harvard Law and Policy Review, Band 11, Heft 2
SSRN
Structuring Water Governance Reform: A Case Study of the Trou-Du-Nord Watershed in Northern Haiti
In: Aqua-LAC, Band 8, Heft 2
SSRN
Cooperative Federalism in Biscayne National Park
In: Natural Resources Journal, Band 56, Heft 1
SSRN
Water Governance in Haiti: An Assessment of Laws and Institutional Capacities
In: Tulane Environmental Law Journal, Band 29, Heft 2
SSRN
Droughts, Floods, and Wildfires: Paleo Perspectives on Disaster Law in the Anthropocene
In: Georgetown International Environmental Law Review (GIELR), Band 27
SSRN
Subsidiarity in Principle: Decentralization of Water Resources Management
The subsidiarity principle of water resources management suggests that water management and service delivery should take place at the lowest appropriate governance level. The principle is attractive for several reasons, primarily because: 1) the governance level can be reduced to reflect environmental characteristics, such as the hydrological borders of a watershed that would otherwise cross administrative boundaries; 2) decentralization promotes community and stakeholder engagement when decision-making is localized; 3) inefficiencies are reduced by eliminating reliance on central government bureaucracies and budgetary constraints; and 4) laws and institutions can be adapted to reflect localized conditions at a scale where integrated natural resources management and climate change adaptation is more focused. Accordingly, the principle of subsidiarity has been welcomed by many states committed to decentralized governance, integrated water resources management, and/or civic participation. However, applications of decentralization have not been uniform, and in some cases have produced frustrating outcomes for states and water resources. Successful decentralization strategies are heavily dependent on dedicated financial resources and human resource capacity. This article explores the nexus between the principle of subsidiarity and the enabling environment, in the hope of articulating factors likely to contribute to, or detract from, the success of decentralized water resources management. Case studies from Haiti, Rwanda, and the United States' Florida Water Management Districts provide examples of the varied stages of decentralization.
BASE