Cover -- Half Title -- Series -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- List of Figures -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: The Fire This Time -- Part I The Meaning of Populism -- 1 The Renewed Relevance of Populism -- 2 The Language of Populism -- Part II Discourses of Eco-Populism and Sham Eco-Populism -- 3 Right-Wing Sham Eco-Populism -- 4 The Right-Wing Sham Eco-Populism of Donald J. Trump -- 5 Progressive Eco-Populism -- Part III The Green Democratic Future That Is Possible -- 6 The Promise of a Green New Deal -- Conclusion: Toward a Progressive Eco-Populist Majority -- Index.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Was Leo Strauss wrong about John Locke? Surely that he was has been the consensus among historians of political thought, though their reasons are sometimes at variance. The Cambridge school, influenced by the work of John Dunn, interprets Locke's work in the light of the Calvinism in his family background. Though attacked by spokesmen for the Church of England, Locke quickly gained admirers among dissenting clergy, for his psychology, his politics, and of course his program for religious toleration, and the proponents of the Calvinist interpreta tion explain why: His discourse closely tracks the theological language of his Calvinist contemporaries. Richard Ashcraft, meanwhile, sought to restore Locke's reputation as a revolutionary by investigating his role in English politics under the Restoration, albeit at the price of reducing the Two Treatises to a tract for the moment. James Tully would likewise save him from the charge of being a capitalist apologist, insisting Locke merely offered a defense of Whig landholding, with the responsibilities as well as the privileges embedded in the English law of estate. All these interpretations dismiss or disregard Strauss's account of Locke as an atheist in the mold of Hobbes and Spinoza who succeeded by his mastery of the art of esoteric writing in concealing his unbelief; as the most successful, because most prudent, proponent of the modern doctrine of natural rights, which revolutionized politics around the world; and as the theorist who prepared the way for modern capitalism by his vigorous defense of unlimited acquisition.
