Suchergebnisse

With reference to three secondary schools in Beijing, this study investigates students' perceptions of multiple identities at four levels -- self, local, national, and global -- and the ways in which students form multiple identities. The study uses a mixed methodology of questionnaires and interview surveys to collect data, and identifies four patterns of Beijing students' multiple identities: a high value on self-identity, a strong affective orientation toward local and national identity, minimal distinction between local and national identities, and an imagined global identity. This study provides empirical data that both supplements and challenges the existing literature on citizenship and citizenship education in the context of globalization. Adapted from the source document.

Cover -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Introduction and Background -- Chapter 1: Conceptualizing the "Post-truth" -- References -- Chapter 2: Information Sources and News Consumption Habitus -- 2.1 Partisan Media Use and COVID-19 Misperceptions -- 2.1.1 COVID-19 Misinformation and Misperceptions -- 2.1.2 Partisan Media in the United States -- 2.1.3 Political Ideology -- 2.1.4 Need for Cognition -- 2.1.5 Trust in Scientists -- 2.1.6 Message Derogation -- 2.1.7 Moderated Mediation Models -- 2.2 Methodology -- 2.2.1 Data Collection -- 2.2.2 Measurements -- 2.2.3 Analytical Strategy -- 2.3 Results -- 2.4 Conclusion and Discussion -- 2.5 Partisan Media, The Extended Parallel Process Model, and COVID-19 Misperceptions -- 2.5.1 The Extended Parallel Process Model -- 2.5.2 Measurements -- 2.5.3 Analytical Strategy -- 2.5.4 Results -- 2.5.5 Conclusion and Discussion -- 2.6 Incidental News Exposure and COVID-19 Misperceptions -- 2.6.1 Incidental News Exposure -- 2.6.2 Media Locus of Control -- 2.6.3 Discussion Network Heterogeneity -- 2.6.4 Defensive Avoidance -- 2.6.5 Measurements -- 2.6.6 Analytical Strategy -- 2.6.7 Results -- 2.6.8 Conclusion and Discussion -- 2.7 The News-Finds-Me Perception and Political Interest -- 2.7.1 The News-Finds-Me Perception -- 2.7.2 Political Interest -- 2.7.3 Methodology -- 2.7.3.1 Measurements -- 2.7.3.2 Analytical Strategy -- 2.7.4 Results -- 2.7.5 Conclusion and Discussion -- References -- Chapter 3: Social Media as a Pandora's Box -- 3.1 Social Media and COVID-19 Misinformation -- 3.1.1 Social Media News Use -- 3.1.2 Social Media Affordance Utilization -- 3.1.3 Discussion Network Homogeneity -- 3.1.4 Methodology -- 3.1.4.1 Data Collection -- 3.1.4.2 Measurements -- 3.1.4.3 Analytical Strategy -- 3.1.5 Results -- 3.1.6 Conclusion and Discussion.

Two analytical perspectives - conventional wisdom derived from warlordism and European colonialism, and soft-power concepts drawn from post-Cold-War American international relations - are prevalent lenses for analysing China's global rise. However, neither considers the role of the past in shaping China's contemporary diplomacy. This paper fills the gap of this under-researched area by providing an alternative perspective featuring analytic categories rooted in China's tributary tradition. It proposes a neo-tributary framework for systematically interpreting historical Chinese mentalities and strategies embedded in China's contemporary power strategy. (Pac Rev/GIGA)

This book explores the role of universities in responding to ongoing changes in China, and in shaping the relations between the university and the state during periods of social change.

Performing two studies, we explore the intermedia attribute agenda-setting effects between the U.S. mainstream newspapers and Twitter. Leveraging computational methodologies, Study 1 analyzes 3,541 newspaper articles and over 1.06 million tweets about the 2020 Black Lives Matter movement, illustrating asymmetrical reciprocity of substantive attributes and mutual independency of affective attributes between both outlets. Study 2 performs in-depth interviews with 16 American journalists, showing that journalists increasingly see Twitter as a news source hub, a self-promotion platform, and a prism of distorted public sentiments. The juxtaposition of both studies revealed the paradigm and driving forces of the intermedia agenda flow.

Abstract
This study systematically reviewed empirical intermedia agenda setting (IAS) research published between 1997 and 2019, in terms of the level of agenda-setting, the methodologies – including the coding strategies and time-series analytical techniques – the types of media, and the flow of IAS effects. According to our results, previous IAS studies exhibited the following trends: (1) an overwhelming majority of the IAS studies was anchored by the first agenda-setting level, whilst examinations of the NAS model and multiple levels have increased in recent years; (2) excessive IAS studies performed content analyses, (3) applied manual coding strategies, (4) conducted cross-lagged correlation analyses to examine time-series effects, (5) and focused on newspapers and Twitter; (6) most IAS research confirmed the flow from one traditional media to another traditional media, whereas more recent studies also revealed the flow from traditional to emerging media, and their reciprocal relationship; (7) the majority of IAS studies confirmed the elite-to-non-elite flow of IAS effects. Based on these findings, this study encourages futures IAS researchers to attach more importance to (1) contextual diversity, (2) balanced examinations of each agenda-setting level, (3) methodological innovations, (4) technological pluralism, and (5) providing more evidence for the flow of IAS effects across different types of media.