Suchergebnisse

This article is encouraging this problem solving with finding and analyzing the formulation of the criminal offense criteria to punishable by death in Indonesian criminal law and reformulation of setting the criminal offender measurement that sentenced to death from the perspective of ius constituendum. The article based on normative legal research by examining primary and secondary legal materials by collecting legal-materials using a card system. The analytical approach uses legislation, concepts, and comparisons. The research analysis was present in the form of descriptive analysis with evaluative, systematic, formulating, and argumentative techniques in this article. The results of this research that conducted are the Indonesian criminal law does not regulate the criminal act criteria that punishable by death so that the execution of the death penalty results in injustice to both the perpetrator, the victim, and the community. The reformulation of Indonesian criminal law shall focus on the objectives and guidelines for the punishment of perpetrators of criminal offenses punishable by death refers to the Draft Criminal Code and the involvement of the victim and the community in their interests if in the execution of capital punishment there is a change to imprisonment or life imprisonment

The acceptance of corporation as the subject of criminal act brings problem to criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility. There are 2 principle problems in this study : (1) How is the current criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility?. (2) How is criminal law policy upon the corporation criminal act responsibility in ius constituendum perspective? The research used normative law method with legislation, comparative and law concept analysis approaches. The result of the research : (1) Criminal code has not regulates corporation as the subject of criminal act that is accountable for criminal law, nevertheless it is partial but inconsistent, (2) Criminal Code Bill 1999-2000 has clearly and completely regulated corporation as subject of criminal act and is accountable for criminal law and accept unconditional criminal responsibility as well as substitute criminal responsibility, although with the exception to solve difficult problem in order to prove mistakes made by corporation. Diterimanya korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana, dapat menimbulkan permasalahan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan pokok, yaitu (1) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana pada saat ini dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi?. (2) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum ? Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian adalah : (1) KUHP tidak mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana sedangkan di beberapa perundang-undangan di luar KUHP telah mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana, namun masih bersifat parsial dan tidak konsisten, (2) Rancangan KUHP 2014-2015 telah mengatur secara lengkap dan tegas korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan menerima pertanggungjawaban pidana mutlak serta pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti, meskipun dengan pengecualian untuk memecahkan persoalan kesulitan dalam membuktikan adanya unsur kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh korporasi.

AbstractLegality principle is a fundamental basis in the criminal law. The principle of legality which is in accordance with Penal Code Article 1 (1), the law stateskhat there are not any actions that are made into a punisment without first all, have any basis of the rule which passed the actions completely. There are so many actions based on customery law as deviant behaviours and should be made into a criminal case (custom delict), but law enforcement can not follow it up because they are contrary to formal legality. And if there are customery law (custom delict) which will be made into criminal case by the court is in accordance with statutes No. 1/Drtl1951, the finding of a court seems unfair fro conventional norms. In Penal Code renewal, the legislative assembly have taken notes of conventional norms. In Penal Code Concept formal legality principle which has been practiced in Wet Boek van Straf Recht (WvS) system has been softened or widened into legality principle of material.Key words: legality principle, criminal law renewal.AbstrakAsas legalitas merupakan asas yang sangat fundamental dalam hukum pidana. Asas legalitas yang tercantum dalam pasal 1 ayat (1) KUHP mutlak tunduk pada perinsip bahwa tidak ada suatu perbuaan yang dapat dipidana tanpa suatu dasar ketentuan undang-undang yang diadakan terlebih dahulu yang menetapkan dalam rumusan yang jelas dari perbuatan tersebut. Cukup banyak perbuatan yang menurut pandangan masyarakat sebagai perbuatan tercela dan patut dipidana (delik adat), akan tetapi penegak hukum tidak dapat menindak lanjutinya karena terbentur pada asas legalitas formal. Kalaupun ada di beberapa daerah delik adat diputus oleh pengadilan berdasarkan UU No. 1/Drt/1951, akan tetapi putusan pengadilan dirasakan tidak mencerminkan rasa keadilan masyarakat hukum adat. Dalam pembaharuan KUHP pembentuk undang-undang telah memperhatikan nilai-nilai hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Dalam Konsep KUHP asas legalitas,(ormal yang selama ini dianut dalam sistem WvS (KUHP) telah diperlunak atau diperluas ke dalam asas legalitas materiel. Dengan perluasan asas legalitas maka pengadilan mempunyai landasan hukum untuk mengadili delik adat yang tidak ada bandingnya dalarrr KUHP.Kata kunci : Asas legalitas, pembaharuan hukum pidana.

How is the implementation of duties and authorities of supervisors andobservers judges of Denpasar District Court in founding the convict? What areobstacles that occur in implementation of duties and authorities of supervisorsand observers judges of Denpasar District Court in founding the convict? The method used in this research was empirical legal research. Itscharacteristic is descriptive. The data sources that used are primary data,secondary data and tertiary data. The primary data / field data were obtained byinterviewing the relevant law enforcement officer that has been determined as asample. The secondary data were obtained of literature studies. The data wasanalyzed by qualitative descriptive analysis to get the vivid conclusion anddescription in discussing the problems in this research. Conclusions derived from this study include: implementation of duties andauthorities of supervisors and observers judges of Denpasar District Court infounding the convict are not running optimally in accordance with the legislationin force. The factor that obstruct are the numbers of supervisors and observersjudges of Denpasar District Court were not adequate, that was one person, therewas no special fund (Operational fund) and there were no strict sanctions forthose when they could not do the duties according to the applicable law; theycould only appeal to the law enforcement agencies / officers of Class IIADenpasar Penitentiary founding the convict.

The presence of financial technology (Fintech) on the one hand makes it easy for people to obtain credit, while on the other hand, it creates various problems. In this study, two issues will be discussed, namely the application of cyber-ethic in protecting personal data and legal issues in collecting debt on Fintech. This research is a qualitative research. Data in the study were collected by means of literature study and presented descriptively and analytically. Cyber-ethic is implemented by protecting personal data. It is a transformation of traditional ethics in cyberspace. The cyber-ethic is very necessary in the business world. The application of cyber-ethic in the world of Fintech is carried out by protecting the personal data of both borrowers and third parties. Cyber-ethic violations have implications for breaking the law. Some of the billing violations on the Fintech business are sexual harassment, defamation, threats and stalking. Borrowing customers are powerless to face debt collectors' behavior, because the debt collectors use the borrowers' personal data to exert psychological pressure on the debtors to pay according to the bills determined unilaterally by Fintech. This condition usually occurs in illegal Fintechs that are not registered with the Financial Services Authority.

ABSTRAK Diterimanya korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana, sehingga menimbulkan permasalahan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan pokok, yaitu (1) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana pada saat ini dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi? (2) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum ? Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian adalah : (1) KUHP tidak mengatur korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan beberapa perundang-undangan di luar KUHP telah mengatur korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana, namun masih bersifat parsial dan tidak konsisten, (2) Rancangan KUHP 2014-2015 telah mengatur secara lengkap dan tegas korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan menerima pertanggungjawaban pidana mutlak serta pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti, meskipun dengan pengecualian untuk memecahkan persoalan kesulitan dalam membuktikan adanya unsur kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh korporasi. Kata kunci : Kebijakan korporasi, Tindak pidana, dan Pertanggungjawaban. ABSTRACT The acceptance of corporation as the subject of criminal act brings problem to criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility. There are 2 principle problems in this study : (1) How is the current criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility? (2) How is criminal law policy upon the corporation criminal act responsibility in ius constituendum perspective? The research used normative law method with legislation, comparative and law concept analysis approaches. The result of the research : (1) Criminal code has not regulates corporation as the subject of criminal act that is accountable for criminal law, nevertheless it is partial but inconsistent, (2) Criminal Code Bill 1999-2000 has clearly and completely regulated corporation as subject of criminal act and is accountable for criminal law and accept unconditional criminal responsibility as well as substitute criminal responsibility, although with the exception to solve difficult problem in order to prove mistakes made by corporation. Keywords: Policy on corporation, Criminal act, and Responsibility.