Suchergebnisse

Demokratisasi adalah sarana untuk mencapai demokrasi, sehingga ide-idetentang demokratisasi berkaitan denga strategi untuk mencapai demokrasi. Prosespendirian demokrasi adalah sebuah proses menginstitusionalisasikan ketidakpastian,menempatkan semua kepentingan pada ketidakpastian. Partai politik adalahkelompok otonom dari warga negara,memiliki kegunaan dalam membuat nominasinominasidan peserta pemilu, memiliki keinginan memandu pengawasan padakekuasaan pemerintahan terus merebut jabatan-jabatan publik dalam organisasipemerintahan. Fungsi utama partai politik adalah mencari dan mempertahankankekuasaan guna mewujudkan program-program yang disusun berdasarkan ideologitertentu.Pemahaman demokrasi yang paling subtansial adalah pemilihan umum.Pemilihan umum merupakan kesempatan bagi para warga negara untuk memilihpejabat-pejabat dalam pemerintahan dan memutuskan apakah yang mereka inginkanuntuk dikerjakan oleh pemerintah. Kepala Daerah adalah penanggung- jawab utamadalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan di daerah. Kepala Daerah akan dinilai rakyatkarena saat ini ia dipilih melalui pemilukada secara langsung.Partai politik pengusung sebelum mendaftarkan calonnya ke KPU Daerahharus telah menemukan pasangan calon yang kapabel dan akuntabel disampingtingkat elektabilitas memadai. Visi, misi, kebijakan, program seyogyanya dibicarakansecara matang oleh calon kepala daerah dan calon wakil kepala daerah beserta partaipolitik pengusung. Partai politik pengusung, baik yang ada di gedung DPRDmaupun di DPW beserta kadernya, wajib mengawal pasangan terpilih kepala daerahdan wakil kepala daerah. Para pemilih yang telah memberikan suaranya padapasangan terpilih, tiba waktunya berani menilai kinerja pada kepala daerah danwakil kepala daerah. Kepala daerah dan wakil kepala daerah saat menjalankan rodapemerintahan harus menghindari budaya rivalitas dan cari popularitas sendirisendiri

This paper examines the factors that led to the emergence of independent candidates for Election of Regent and Vice Regent of Garut in 2013. The number of candidates who register through independent channels reached 22 candidate pairs with diverse professional and organizational background after verified 4 pairs of candidates contesting with 46 candidate pairs from political parties/coalitions of political parties. This independent candidate is present amid the political dynamics of Garut, which is always colored by political elite conflict and unusual change of regent due to corruption case and violation of ethics/legislation. By using a qualitative approach with the interview technique this paper discusses 3 factors that cause the emergence of individual candidates, that is First, an institutional factor of the weak party, Second, Factor of recruitment process of an exclusive and centralized political party. The third is the circulation factor of local political elites, where individual candidates arise as the new middle-class increases, dissatisfaction with public service and civil service, and the barrage of elite political conflicts that occur prior to the election of Garut Regent and Vice Regent of 2013.

This research discusses the modalities in the victory of migrant Minangkabau candidates in the 2019 Legislative Election. Minangkabau is one of the ethnic groups in Indonesia synonymous with a matrilineal kinship system and an institutionalized tradition of migrating. Migrating is a valuable capital utilized by Minangkabau migrant Legislative Candidates to gain support for votes in electoral contests. The research was conducted on two Minangkabau migrant Legislative Candidates who took part in the contestation in the Legislative Elections for the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method is qualitative with a case study type. Data were collected through interviews with Minangkabau migrant candidates, voting communities, and people involved in winning candidates, such as traditional leaders and the Minangkabau community in the realm and overseas. The results of the research concluded that Fadli Zon (Gerindra Party Legislative Candidate, Electoral District of West Java V) and Jon Erizal (National Mandate Party Legislative Candidate, Electoral District of Riau I) as two of the Minangkabau migrants, the legislative candidates for the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia succeeded in utilizing existing social capital and successfully elected in the 2019 Legislative Election 2019 contestation overseas. Both are considered to have good leadership figures, able to carry out the mandate, and caring, humane, and responsible individuals. Joined in the same social entity, namely the network of Minangkabau migrants who gather through the Minangkabau migrant community, the Minangkabau Family Association. Fadli Zon became General Chairman of the Central Executive Board of the Minangkabau Family Association, and Jon Erizal served as Vice General Chairman of the Riau Minangkabau Family Association. Besides building intensive communication with the community in the election contestation.

This article attempts to discuss the practice of democratic governance in contemporary Indonesia. This study is essential since Indonesia is one of the countries transitioning from authoritarianism towards democracy following the fall of Suharto's regime. This study shall answer whether democratic governance in Indonesia experiences a crisis, with a focus of analysis on the four dimensions of democratic governance, namely: (1) rule of law, (2) human rights, (3) civil society, and (4) elections and political process. This study applies a qualitative method by collecting data from document studies and literary studies. The findings in this study indicate that democratic governance in Indonesia experiences a crisis as evidenced by the remaining-weak legal supremacy in Indonesia, and the existence of violations of the implementation of human rights, eventually led to horizontal conflicts. The inability of civil society organizations to carry out their functions in democratization as an intermediary between the community and the state as well as to influence government policies for the public interest. Another recent weakness is there are still strong issues related to primordialism in the occasion of General Elections. This crisis of democratic governance shall bring Indonesia to "the decline of democracy" instead of democratic consolidation.

Abstract— Public policy and associated governmental regulatory issues play critical roles in shaping the practice of supply chain management. This study attempts to examine the role and concept of policy of supply chain network, particularly dialectical model proposed by Marsh Smith (2000) in explaining policy outcomes by taking a case study of communal land policy-making process. This study applies qualitative method and primary data collection techniques of in-depth interviews and document study. This study shows that dialectical model can be applied in explaining the role of policy network on the outcomes of communal land policy in Riau, Indonesia. The outcomes of communal land policy are determined by the dialectical relationship between structure and agency, network and context, network and outcome, as well as problem orientation from policy actors. Inside-government-actors dominate the policy-making process and create a limited network. Therefore, outside-government-actors do not have sufficient access to influence policy outcomes.

This study discusses why the impact of the policy of developing oil palm plantations by corporations in Riau Province is not felt fairly and equally by the community. This study uses a qualitative approach and meta-analysis with data sources from books, scientific journals, and mass media. Data is analyzed by interactive methods and supported by theory. The results of this study indicate that neoliberalism has had an influence on the policy of developing oil palm plantations in Riau Province. This neoliberalism practice can be seen from the policy of the development of oil palm plantations in Riau which are more impartial and benefit the corporation or the owners of capital than the people around the plantation area. This can occur because of the dominance of companies and corporations in relation to the regional government. Bribery is the way they use if the lobbies made against politicians and government officials have not succeeded in achieving the goal. The state becomes subordinate in its relations with the corporation, so what happens is corporate hegemony in the development of oil palm plantations in Riau Province.

Indonesia's policy of customary land regulation does not eradicate the problems faced by indigenous people. Disputes over customary land proprietary rights continue to occur even in this current era of decentralization and democracy. Departing from empirical phenomena, this study aims to uncover customary land policy dilemmas and explore strategies to reconstruct customary land policies in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach to literature study methods. This study was conducted in Indonesia and uses various cases of customary land policy from the provinces of Riau, East Kalimantan, and Papua. The data collected in this study is derived from books, documents, journals, research results, and news in electronic media. The results of the study show that Indonesia has a policy dilemma in the regulation of customary land for a number of reasons. First, customary land policies governed by customary law and national law often result in disputes. Second, in relation to natural resources management, there is no synchronization and harmony between sectoral laws and the Basic Principles of Agrarian Law (UUPA). Third, the government is yet to create policies at the local level regarding the protection and recognition of customary land. Therefore, the ideal strategy of policy reconstruction is to create a synergy between government institutions and all stakeholders in the policymaking process of customary land regulation. The conclusion of this study is that the policy dilemma of customary land in Indonesia will continue to occur if the government does not involve the participation of indigenous people and groups of interest in the policymaking process of customary land regulation.