Suchergebnisse

Tujuan penulisan ini ialah untuk mengkaji serta menganalisis mekanisme pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa dan memaham iserta mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan agar bisa mengetahui efektivitas pengelolaan alokasi dana desa dalam meningkatkan program pembangunan desa serta pemberdayaan masyarakat serta hambatan-hambatan dalam pelaksanaannya. Riset Hukum Empiris yang diterapkan pada penelitian ini, yakni riset mengkaji permasalahan yang akan dibahas berdasarkan pada fakta dan kenyataan yang ada. Hasil penelitian menunjukan jika efektivitas pengelolaan alokasi dana desa dalam meningkatkan program pemberdayaan masyarakat desa serta pembangunan desa sudah baik secara keseluruhan. Alokasi dana desa memiliki tujuan dalam peningkatan terselenggaranya pemerintahan desa ketika menerapkan layanan pemerintahan, pembangunan serta lembaga masyarakat untuk persiapan, penerapan, pengawasan serta pertanggungjawaban, dalam implementasinya ada beberapa hambatan diantaranya: peraturan yang sering berubah dari pemerintah, faktor alam dan situasi di masyarakat. Kata Kunci: Efektivitas, Pengelolaan, Alokasi Dana Desa ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to examine and analyze the mechanism for managing the Village Fund Allocation and understand and determine the factors that influence the management of the Village Fund Allocation. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the management of village fund allocations in improving village development programs and community empowerment as well as obstacles in their implementation. Empirical Legal Research applied in this research, namely research examining the problems to be discussed based on the facts and existing facts. The results showed that the effectiveness of managing village fund allocations in improving village community empowerment programs and village development was good as a whole. The allocation of village funds has a goal in improving the implementation of village government when implementing government ...

China's Social Credit System (CSC) is a reputation system adopted by the Government of the Peoples' Republic of China that establish a mechanism of rewarding and imposing punishment to its citizen, by taking into account the behavioral performance and compliance to the law and regulation. This article aimed to reviews the concept and the scope of implementation of China's SCS and to analyze the possibility of the Indonesian Government to adopt it into Indonesia's legal system and legal culture. This article reflects a doctrinal legal research that collects primary and secondary sources and uses statutory, comparative, and analytical approaches. This article found that SCS basically aims at creating a comprehensive data based-system to improve the citizen's behavior based on the scoring system that entails rewards and sanctions. The widely accepted of this system by the citizen of PRC, however, does not correspond to a remaining legal issue about the lack of protection of privacy rights, particularly regarding the naming and shaming of a blacklisted person. This article suggests that Indonesia may adopt some China's SCS aspects, including the basic idea of the upgrading of the standard of citizen behavior, the establishment of a comprehensive system that integrating all data, and partial adoption of the data analysis. However, it seems that the naming and shaming for blacklisted persons do not relevant to be adopted by the Indonesian government in the near future, in a consideration of the legal culture in Indonesia and the communal life of the Indonesian peoples.

The third Amendment of UUD 1945 in 2001 put the position of MPR is no longer as the highest state institution but equal with another state institutions. This is certainly make a legal consequence to the legal product that produced by MPR and that legal product is Tap MPR. Tap MPR is no longer regulated in hierarchy of legislation in article 7 (1) Constitution No. 10 of 2004 on the establishment of legislation because Tap MPR is not included in the general legislation. But then the issuance of Constitution No. 12 of 2011 set back Tap MPR in hierarchy of legislation because some of Tap MPR is still valid in accordance with the Tap MPR number of I / MPR / 2003 on Judicial Review Matter and Legal Status of the Tap MPR Decree from 1960-2002. If it viewed through a political perspective, it can be said that Tap MPR Decree setting tug in the hierarchy of legislation can be said to be inconsistent of legal political or unclear. Said to be inconsistent or unclear because it is not in line with changes in the MPR authority and contrary to the theory of hierarchy of norms as a result of changes in the authority of MPR must also align with the legislation and do not deserve to be above the legislation. The debate re-occurs when the authority of the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of MPR is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution questionable. Is the Constitutional Court is authorized to review the constitutionality of Tap MPR towards the UUD 1945? According to the Article 24C of UUD 1945, Constitutional Court is only authorized to review legislation towards UUD 1945. There is void of norm on the authority of the Constitutional Court but on the other side, citizens who feel their constitutional rights are violated by the existence of the MPR cannot do anything. The Constitutional Court was established with the aim of legislation under the Constitution does not conflict with the UUD 1945, the next purpose is to protect and ensure the constitutional rights of citizens contained in the UUD 1945 in order not to be violated by officials or state agencies. Departed from that purpose then the Constitutional Court is authorized to review the constitutionality of Tap MPR is considered contrary to the UUD 1945.

Government Authority in the implementation of land acquisition for the constructionof a public interest in the Government authorities to provide land for the construction of thepublic interest . The problem that arises then is unclear rules governing the authority of theGovernment in the implementation of land acquisition for the construction of the publicinterest as well as legal protection for land rights holders affected by the land acquisition bythe government. This journal normative method to approach the study of literature. In Article6 of Law No. 12 The year 2012 is mentioned land acquisition for public interests held by theGovernment. Section 8 of Presidential Decree. 71 The year 2012 also mentioned that theGovernor carry out a preparatory stage of land acquisition after receiving the land acquisitionplanning documents. Law No. 2 In 2012 and Presidential Decree. 71 The year 2012 is set onthe deliberations, awarding damages, and filing a lawsuit for land rights holders. It can beconcluded authority for the implementation of land acquisition for the construction of publicinterest under the authority of the Governor and the Provincial Government as the legalprotection of the rights of the owner of the land is reflected through the regulation ofdeliberation, of compensation, and the provision of opportunity to file a lawsuit to theAdministrative Court and to District Court.

Kerugian secara perdata yang dialami oleh para penghayat kepercayaan tradisional menjadi acuan penting dimohonkan pengujian Pasal 61 ayat (1) dan (2) serta dalam Pasal 64 ayat (1) dan (5) Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan. Rumusan masalah pada jurnal ini ialah apa saja pokok permohonan pemohon yang relevan dengan pemenuhan hak keperdataan warga negara sebagaimana dimuat didalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 97/PUU-XIV/2018 ?; serta Bagaimana pertimbangan Mahkamah Kostitusi terhadap pengajuan pokok permohonan tersebut? Dengan tujuan untuk menguraikan pokok-pokok permohonan yang memiliki kaitan dengan pemenuhan hak perdata seorang warga negara sebagaimana diuraikan secara numeratif dalam Putusan MK No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016 oleh para pemohon; serta Mendeskripsikan pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi menyikapi pokok-pokok permohonan secara perdata yang telah inkracht pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 97/PUU-XIV/2018. Penelitian ini disusun dalam bentuk penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan dengan mengunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan fakta serta kasus. Pokok-Pokok Alasan Pemohon Pada Putusan Mahkamah Kostitusi No. 97/PUU-XIV/2018 dengan Hak Perdata seorang Warga Negara terdiri dari 3 hal yakni tidak diterbitkan Surat Kepemilikan Tanah; Akta Nikah dan Akta Kelahiran serta Kartu Keluarga yang tidak valid serta pembatasan hak kostitusional untuk mengakses lapangan pekerjaan sesuai dengan amanat kostitusi. Pertimbangan Mahkamah Kostitusi Terhadap Pokok-Pokok Alasan Pemohon dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 97/PUU-XIV/2018 adalah dengan mencabut ketentuan dan menentukan kekuatan hukum tidak mengikat pada rumusan ayat tersebut. Kata Kunci: Hak Perdata, Penghayat Kepercayaan, Dokumen Kependudukan, Akta. Civil damages suffered by traditional trust supporters are an important reference when examining Article 61 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (5) of the Population Administration Law. The formulation of the problem in this journal is what are the main petitioners 'petitions relevant to the fulfillment of citizens' civil rights as contained in Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97 / PUU-XIV / 2018 ?; and How is the Constitutional Court's consideration of the filing of the petition? With the aim to elaborate on the main points of the petition which are related to the fulfillment of civil rights of a citizen as described numerically in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 97 / PUU-XIV / 2016 by the applicant; and Describe the consideration of the Constitutional Court addressing the points of the petition which have been inkracht in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 97 / PUU-XIV / 2018. This research was arranged in the form of normative legal research with a legislative, fact and case approach. Principals of the Petitioners' Reason in the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 97 / PUU-XIV / 2018 with the Civil Rights of a Citizen consisting of 3 things namely not issued a Land Ownership Certificate; Invalid Marriage Certificate and Birth Certificate and Family Card and restrictions on constitutional rights to access employment in accordance with the constitutional mandate. Constitutional Court's Consideration of the Principal Reasons of the Petitioner in the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 97 / PUU-XIV / 2018 is to revoke the provisions and determine the non-binding legal force on the formulation of the paragraph. Keywords: Civil Rights, Dwellers of Trust, Population Documents, Deed.

Foundation legal entities have organs that carry out the functions of the foundation. The management of the foundation has responsibility for the legal entity of the foundation. This study aims to find out about disputes between foundations and foundation administrators in internal conflicts including the dismissal, replacement and appointment of foundation administrators and procedures for resolving disputes between foundations and foundation administrators through the general judiciary and state administration. If a board member is found to have acted detrimental to the foundation, then based on the decision of the supervisor's meeting, the board can be dismissed, this is a trigger for disputes that occur within the foundation. The settlement of this dispute can be resolved by filing a lawsuit by the management which is dismissed on the basis of unlawful acts committed by the foundation. This research is normative legal research with qualitative analysis. This study concludes disputes between foundations and foundation management are caused by the implementation of foundation activities that are not in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the implementation of the foundation's articles of association and the household itself. Settlement of disputes between foundations and foundation administrators through judicial institutions is one alternative dispute resolution that can be used and is stated in the provisions concerning foundations, depending on the type of dispute, and the object of the dispute for dispute resolution before the court.

Governor as the head of the province has the authority to regulate the allocation and use of assets held by the provincial government, including land management rights. The purpose of management rights titled land is to be given to a third party. This provision is based on the Decree of the Governor in form of land utilization permit. Furthermore, over that given land, the rights of land can be applied above it, for example Building Right Title. Problem that occur is if the Governor as concessionaires strip the utilization permit that has been granted, as in the case of Management Rights Titled Land No.2 with the Building Right Title Land No. 80 on behalf of PT. Abdi Persada Nusantara in Kesiman Petilan Village, Denpasar. What about the legal status of land rights that existed on the management rights titled land and the legal consequences of the burdening the liability right to management rights titled land after the revocation of the land utilization permit. This type of research in this thesis is a normative legal research, the research that seek answers by examining the problems of legal materials and the use of primary and secondary theoretical foundation as one of the characteristics of a normative study. The approach used in this study is the Regulation Approach, Legal Concepts Analysis Approach and the Case Approach, furthermore the discussion done by descriptive analysis way by describing and analyzing the results obtained from the legal materials, systematically arranged so that the conclusion can be obtained. Result of study of the prooblems studied is the legal status of land rights on management rights titled land that it's utilization permit has been stripped by the concessionaires became abolished. Abolishment of the land rights led to liability rights does not lead to the abolishment of the secured debt. Receivables creditors still there, but no longer as claims that guaranteed specifically by the special position of the creditor (lender preferred)

Bali Provincial Regulation No. 8 of 2020 concerning Bali Province Industrial Development Plan Year 2020-2040 was created to balance the structure and fundamentals of the Balinese economy which includes three pillars, namely tourism, agriculture, and industry. Besides, it also reflects an effort to reduce the dependence of the Balinese economy on tourism. This article assesses the process of the creation of Bali Provincial Regulation No.8 of 2020 concerning Bali Province Industrial Development Plan Year 2020-2040 and its content, mainly regarding the position of the small and medium tourism industry. It also offers a lens on the future legal framework of the tourism industry in Bali. It is a normative legal study that uses the statute, conceptual, and analytical approaches. This article argues that the future legal framework of the tourism industry should deal with, at least, the following five issues: mass tourism; degradation of nature and environmental quality; meeting the perception and expectation of travelers; the quality of tourism services; and protection to the tourists as a costumer.

Hak atas tanah dapat beralih dengan cara pewarisan melalui hibah wasiat. Dalam peralihan hak atas tanah harus dilakukan pendaftaran tanah untuk menjamin kepastian hukum. Terdapat ketidaksesuaian penerapan aturan pelaksanaan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah berdasarkan hibah wasiat di Kabupaten Tabanan. Berdasarkan Pasal 112 Peraturan Menteri Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1997, dalam hal pewarisan berdasarkan hibah wasiat harus melampirkan akta PPAT mengenai hibah yang dilakukan oleh Pelaksana Wasiat, namun dalam prakteknya penulis menemukan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah berdasarkan hibah wasiat tanpa akta PPAT. Adapun permasalahan yang diangkat di dalam tesis ini adalah mengenai bagaimana pelaksanaan peralihan hak atas tanah berdasarkan hibah wasiat tanpa adanya pelaksana wasiat di Kabupaten Tabanan dan kapan kepastian hukum penerima hibah wasiat dalam peralihan hak atas tanah tanpa adanya pelaksana wasiat di Kabupaten Tabanan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris karena terjadinya kesenjangan antara aturan yang mengatur dengan masalah-masalah yang terjadi di masyarakat. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari ruang lingkup pembahasannya yaitu mengenai apa yang tertuang dalam peraturan perundang-undangan (das sollen) dilakukan penyimpangan-penyimpangan dalam praktek peralihan hak atas tanah berdasarkan hibah wasiat. Jenis data yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini bersumber dari dua jenis data, yaitu data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dilakukan melalui wawancara dan membaca literatur-literatur yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Untuk teknik analisis data, digunakan teknik deskriptif analitis, dikaitkan dengan teori-teori relevan kemudian disimpulkan untuk menjawab permasalahan. Hasil penelitian terhadap permasalahan yang dikaji yaitu pelaksanaan peralihan hak atas tanah berdasarkan hibah wasiat tanpa adanya pelaksana wasiat di Kabupaten Tabanan adalah tidak memerlukan akta PPAT mengenai hibah yang dilakukan oleh Pelaksana Wasiat karena tidak adanya penunjukan pelaksana wasiat. Jadi dasar peralihan hak atas tanah berdasarkan hibah wasiat adalah akta hibah wasiat itu sendiri. Kepastian hukum penerima hibah wasiat dalam peralihan hak atas tanah tanpa adanya pelaksana wasiat di Kabupaten Tabanan adalah didapatkan sejak dibukanya akta wasiat yang diberikan oleh pewaris kepada penerima hibah yang merupakan kehendak terakhir dari pewaris dan dengan dilakukan pendaftaran hak atas tanah sehingga diperoleh sertifikat sebagai tanda bukti haknya. Kata kunci : Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Hibah Wasiat, Pelaksana Wasiat ; Transfer of rights over the land can switch by way of inheritance through grant probate. In transitional land rights, land registration should be done to ensure a legal certainty. There is a mismatch application of the rules implementing the transitional registration of land rights based on grant probate in Tabanan. Pursuant to Article 112 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/Head of National Land Agency No. 3 of 1997, in terms of inheritance-based grants, it must attach a testament of PPAT deed of grant made by the Executive Testament, but in practice, the authors found a deed of grant probate without a will executor, while inheritance based grant probate, executors require a role in the transfer of land rights. This type of research in this thesis is empirical legal research because of the gap between legislation and practice. Type of data used in this study came from two types of data, namely primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used in this research was conducted through interviews and reading literatures related to the problems. The results of a study of the problems is the implementation of transitional assessed land rights based on grant probate in Tabanan does not require PPAT deed of grant made by the Executive in the absence of the designation of Probate Executors. So the basis of the transfer of rights to land based grant will is testament grant deed itself. Legal certainty of grantees testament has been obtained since the opening of the deed given by the heir to the donee which is the last intention of the testator and the registration of land rights in order to obtain a certificate as proof of his rights. Keywords : transfer of land rights, grant probate, will executor

AbstractThis article assesses the responsibility of local governments in Indonesia for the management of refugee care, following the enactment of Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 concerning the Treatment of Refugees (the "PR"). It highlights the limited authority of local governments in handling refugee issues—which is an issue that cuts across several national legal and administrative regimes including Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, and Immigration. This article focuses on the constraints of local political dynamics and budgeting in allocating local government funds for refugee care. In addressing these concerns, the authors argue that the PR should be amended to explicitly define the role of local governments in managing refugee issues and to include the regional revenue and expenditure budget as a source of funding. In addition, the authors argue that local governments that are hosting refugees should establish relevant local regulations for implementation of the PR.