Kiobel and Extraterritoriality: Here, (Not) There, (Not Even) Everywhere
In: Edward T. Swaine, Kiobel and Extraterritoriality: Here, (Not) There, (Not Even) Everywhere, 69 Okla. L. Rev. 23 (2016)
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Edward T. Swaine, Kiobel and Extraterritoriality: Here, (Not) There, (Not Even) Everywhere, 69 Okla. L. Rev. 23 (2016)
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: New York University journal of international law & politics, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 833-850
ISSN: 0028-7873
In: Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Band 21, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Southern California Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: American Journal of International Law, Band 100, Heft 1
SSRN
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 100, Heft 1, S. 259-266
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 98, S. 343-346
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Chicago Journal of International Law, Band 2, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Harvard international law journal, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 0017-8063
In: Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Band 30
SSRN
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 93, S. 247-249
ISSN: 2169-1118
SSRN
In: European journal of international law, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 1443-1454
ISSN: 1464-3596
Abstract
This short article responds to observations made by Alina Miron and Paolo Palchetti about the treaty sections of the Restatement of the Law (Fourth): The Foreign Relations Law of the United States. We describe the nature of the Restatement process and explain why the choices made in the Restatement (Fourth) were more constrained than what might be suggested by Miron and Palchetti's critique. We also engage with some of their specific observations about the Restatement (Fourth)'s approach to treaties, resisting the suggestion that the approach marks a retreat from engagement with international law.