Suchergebnisse

Biotechnology can greatly improve the efficiency of forest tree breeding for the production of biomass, energy, and materials. However, EU regulations impede the market introduction of genetically modified (GM) trees so their socioeconomic and environmental benefits are not realized. European policy makers should concentrate on a science-based regulatory process.

This report is the outcome of an EFSA procurement (OC/EFSA/GMO/2015/02) which aims at reviewing relevant scientific information on RNA interference (RNAi) that could serve as baseline information for the environmental risk assessment of RNAi‐based genetically modified (GM) plants. The report is based on a systematic literature search on the use of RNAi molecules in arthropods, nematodes, annelids and molluscs with dsRNA, siRNA and miRNA applied primarily through feeding and soaking (oral ingestion). The numbers of retrieved publications covering these areas are reported, along with the species name, life stages tested, the target gene and its function, details of the test substances and their concentrations used, methods of delivery and effects. Separate sections discuss the available information on: (1) the uptake and systematic spread of RNAi activity, including a description of the various components involved in this process; (2) the mechanisms of dsRNA‐,
siRNA‐ and miRNA‐elicited gene silencing and the different factors involved in RNAi efficiency; (3) routes of exposure of the biotic and abiotic environment to dsRNA, siRNA and miRNA from GM plants; (4) the environmental fate of dsRNA, siRNA and miRNA; and (5) the various factors that may limit non‐target effects including exposure, factors influencing the silencing efficiency of dsRNA, siRNA and miRNA, possible unintended and off‐target effects, and their mechanisms. Finally, an overview of the species of arthropods, nematodes, annelids and molluscs for which genomic data are available is also presented. The report identifies some of the challenges involved in developing plants with RNAi systems which affect invertebrate gene expression. The report also concludes that, currently, knowledge on issues such as exposure, specificity, offtarget effects, sequence similarities and bioinformatics is very limited, as only a few RNAi expressing plants which specifically target
invertebrate species have been developed and comprehensively studied.

In legal frameworks worldwide, genetically modified plants (GMPs) are subjected to pre-market environmental risk assessment (ERA) with the aim of identifying potential effects on the environment. In the European Union, the EFSA Guidance Document introduces the rationale that GMPs, as well as their newly produced metabolites, represent the potential stressor to be evaluated during ERA. As a consequence, during several phases of ERA for cultivation purposes, it is considered necessary to use whole plants or plant parts in experimental protocols. The importance of in planta studies as a strategy to address impacts of GMPs on non-target organisms is demonstrated, to evaluate both effects due to the intended modification in plant phenotype (e.g. expression of Cry proteins) and effects due to unintended modifications in plant phenotype resulting from the transformation process (e.g. due to somaclonal variations or pleiotropic effects). In planta tests are also necessary for GMPs in which newly expressed metabolites cannot easily be studied in vitro. This paper reviews the scientific literature supporting the choice of in planta studies as a fundamental tool in ERA of GMPs in cultivation dossiers; the evidence indicates they can realistically mimic the ecological relationships occurring in their receiving environments and provide important insights into the biology and sustainable management of GMPs.

In legal frameworks worldwide, genetically modified plants (GMPs) are subjected to pre-market environmental risk assessment (ERA) with the aim of identifying potential effects on the environment. In the European Union, the EFSA Guidance Docuinent introduces the rationale that GMPs, as well as their newly produced metabolites, represent the potential stressor to be evaluated during ERA. As a consequence, during several phases of ERA for cultivation purposes, it is considered necessary to use whole plants or plant parts in experimental protocols. The importance of in planta studies as a strategy to address impacts of GMPs tin non-target organislns is demonstrated, to evaluate both effects due to the intended modification in plant phenotype (e.g. expression of Cry proteins) and effects due to unintended modifications in plant phenotype resultihg from the transformation process (e.g. due to somaclonal variations or pleiotropic effects). In planta tests are also necessary for GMPs in which newly expressed metabolites cannot easily be studied in vitro. This paper reviews the scientific literature supporting the choice of in planta studies as a fundamental tool in ERA of GMPs in cultivation dossiers; the evidence indicates they can realistically mimic the ecological relationships occurring in their receiving environments and provide important insights into the biology and sustainable management of GMPs.

In legal frameworks worldwide, genetically modified plants (GMPs) are subjected to pre-market environmental risk assessment (ERA) with the aim of identifying potential effects on the environment. In the European Union, the EFSA Guidance Docuinent introduces the rationale that GMPs, as well as their newly produced metabolites, represent the potential stressor to be evaluated during ERA. As a consequence, during several phases of ERA for cultivation purposes, it is considered necessary to use whole plants or plant parts in experimental protocols. The importance of in planta studies as a strategy to address impacts of GMPs tin non-target organislns is demonstrated, to evaluate both effects due to the intended modification in plant phenotype (e.g. expression of Cry proteins) and effects due to unintended modifications in plant phenotype resultihg from the transformation process (e.g. due to somaclonal variations or pleiotropic effects). In planta tests are also necessary for GMPs in which newly expressed metabolites cannot easily be studied in vitro. This paper reviews the scientific literature supporting the choice of in planta studies as a fundamental tool in ERA of GMPs in cultivation dossiers; the evidence indicates they can realistically mimic the ecological relationships occurring in their receiving environments and provide important insights into the biology and sustainable management of GMPs.

The use of RNA interference (RNAi) enables the silencing of target genes in plants or plant-dwelling organisms, through the production of double stranded RNA (dsRNA) resulting in altered plant characteristics. Expression of properly synthesized dsRNAs in plants can lead to improved crop quality characteristics or exploit new mechanisms with activity against plant pests and pathogens. Genetically modified (GM) crops exhibiting resistance to viruses or insects via expression of dsRNA have received authorization for cultivation outside Europe. Some products derived from RNAi plants have received a favourable opinion from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for import and processing in the European Union (EU). The authorization process in the EU requires applicants to produce a risk assessment considering food/feed and environmental safety aspects of living organisms or their derived food and feed products. The present paper discusses the main aspects of the safety assessment (comparative assessment, molecular characterization, toxicological assessment, nutritional assessment, gene transfer, interaction with target and non-target organisms) for GM plants expressing dsRNA, according to the guidelines of EFSA. Food/feed safety assessment of products from RNAi plants is expected to be simplified, in the light of the consideration that no novel proteins are produced. Therefore, some of the data requirements for risk assessment do not apply to these cases, and the comparative compositional analysis becomes the main source of evidence for food/feed safety of RNAi plants. During environmental risk assessment, the analysis of dsRNA expression levels of the GM trait, and the data concerning the observable effects on non-target organisms (NTO) will provide the necessary evidence for ensuring safety of species exposed to RNAi plants. Bioinformatics may provide support to risk assessment by selecting target gene sequences with low similarity to the genome of NTOs possibly exposed to dsRNA. The analysis of these topics in ...

The use of RNA interference (RNAi) enables the silencing of target genes in plants or plant-dwelling organisms, through the production of double stranded RNA (dsRNA) resulting in altered plant characteristics. Expression of properly synthesized dsRNAs in plants can lead to improved crop quality characteristics or exploit new mechanisms with activity against plant pests and pathogens. Genetically modified (GM) crops exhibiting resistance to viruses or insects via expression of dsRNA have received authorization for cultivation outside Europe. Some products derived from RNAi plants have received a favourable opinion from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for import and processing in the European Union (EU). The authorization process in the EU requires applicants to produce a risk assessment considering food/feed and environmental safety aspects of living organisms or their derived food and feed products. The present paper discusses the main aspects of the safety assessment (comparative assessment, molecular characterization, toxicological assessment, nutritional assessment, gene transfer, interaction with target and non-target organisms) for GM plants expressing dsRNA, according to the guidelines of EFSA. Food/feed safety assessment of products from RNAi plants is expected to be simplified, in the light of the consideration that no novel proteins are produced. Therefore, some of the data requirements for risk assessment do not apply to these cases, and the comparative compositional analysis becomes the main source of evidence for food/feed safety of RNAi plants. During environmental risk assessment, the analysis of dsRNA expression levels of the GM trait, and the data concerning the observable effects on non-target organisms (NTO) will provide the necessary evidence for ensuring safety of species exposed to RNAi plants. Bioinformatics may provide support to risk assessment by selecting target gene sequences with low similarity to the genome of NTOs possibly exposed to dsRNA. The analysis of these topics in risk assessment indicates that the science-based regulatory process in Europe is considered to be applicable to GM RNAi plants, therefore the evaluation of their safety can be effectively conducted without further modifications. Outcomes from the present paper offer suggestions for consideration in future updates of the EFSA Guidance documents on risk assessment of GM organisms.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carried out a consultation to collect input from the scientific community and all interested parties for the risk assessment of the low level (LL) presence of genetically modified plant material in imported food and feed under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. A two-step approach was followed. The draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared by the ad hoc Working Group of the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 21 September 2016. EFSA received approximately 100 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 11 Member States. Based on the outcome of the dedicated consultation, a second draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 5 April 2017. EFSA received approximately 60 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 7 interested parties. The current report summarises the outcome of the two-step consultation, and includes a brief description of the comments received and how the comments were addressed. Comments related to policy or risk management aspects were considered out of the remit of the GMO Panel and outside the scope of these consultations; therefore these are not addressed in this document. The GMO Panel prepared an updated version of the LL Scientific Opinion taking into account the comments under its remit received. EFSA and its GMO Panel wish to thank European Member States, all stakeholders and the general public for their contributions. The LL Scientific

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carried out a consultation to collect input from the scientific community and all interested parties for the risk assessment of the low level (LL) presence of genetically modified plant material in imported food and feed under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. A two-step approach was followed. The draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared by the ad hoc Working Group of the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 21 September 2016. EFSA received approximately 100 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 11 Member States. Based on the outcome of the dedicated consultation, a second draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 5 April 2017. EFSA received approximately 60 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 7 interested parties. The current report summarises the outcome of the two-step consultation, and includes a brief description of the comments received and how the comments were addressed. Comments related to policy or risk management aspects were considered out of the remit of the GMO Panel and outside the scope of these consultations; therefore these are not addressed in this document. The GMO Panel prepared an updated version of the LL Scientific Opinion taking into account the comments under its remit received. EFSA and its GMO Panel wish to thank European Member States, all stakeholders and the general public for their contributions. The LL Scientific

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carried out a consultation to collect input from the scientific community and all interested parties for the risk assessment of the low level (LL) presence of genetically modified plant material in imported food and feed under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. A two-step approach was followed. The draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared by the ad hoc Working Group of the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 21 September 2016. EFSA received approximately 100 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 11 Member States. Based on the outcome of the dedicated consultation, a second draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 5 April 2017. EFSA received approximately 60 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 7 interested parties. The current report summarises the outcome of the two-step consultation, and includes a brief description of the comments received and how the comments were addressed. Comments related to policy or risk management aspects were considered out of the remit of the GMO Panel and outside the scope of these consultations; therefore these are not addressed in this document. The GMO Panel prepared an updated version of the LL Scientific Opinion taking into account the comments under its remit received. EFSA and its GMO Panel wish to thank European Member States, all stakeholders and the general public for their contributions. The LL Scientific

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carried out a consultation to collect input from the scientific community and all interested parties for the risk assessment of the low level (LL) presence of genetically modified plant material in imported food and feed under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. A two-step approach was followed. The draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared by the ad hoc Working Group of the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 21 September 2016. EFSA received approximately 100 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 11 Member States. Based on the outcome of the dedicated consultation, a second draft LL Scientific Opinion was prepared and endorsed by the Panel for a dedicated consultation with European Member States at its plenary meeting on 5 April 2017. EFSA received approximately 60 comments on the draft LL Scientific Opinion from 7 interested parties. The current report summarises the outcome of the two-step consultation, and includes a brief description of the comments received and how the comments were addressed. Comments related to policy or risk management aspects were considered out of the remit of the GMO Panel and outside the scope of these consultations; therefore these are not addressed in this document. The GMO Panel prepared an updated version of the LL Scientific Opinion taking into account the comments under its remit received. EFSA and its GMO Panel wish to thank European Member States, all stakeholders and the general public for their contributions. The LL Scientific