Suchergebnisse

L'8 maggio 2020 il Dipartimento di Scienze giuridiche dell'Università di Pisa ha chiesto a tre dottorandi di indagare sull'impatto della pandemia da Covid-19 in sei paesi: Francia e Regno Unito (Valentina Fredianelli), Germania e Austria (Andrea Gatti), Stati Uniti e Spagna (Federico Spagnoli). Questo contributo intende riassumere i loro interventi e analizzarli dai quattro punti di vista maggiormente problematici: il fondamento giuridico dello stato di emergenza, i rapporti fra governo e parlamento, le interazioni fra i differenti livelli di governo e, infine, il controllo giudiziario sulle libertà fondamentali. Si è scelto inoltre di presentare, a titolo di confronto, anche il contributo di due studiosi brasiliani (Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli e Hugo Frazão) sulla risposta istituzionale alla pandemia in Brasile. Abstract inglese On May 8th 2020, the Department of law of the University of Pisa asked three Ph.D candidates to investigate the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in six different countries: France and UK (Valentina Fredianelli), Germany, Austria (Andrea Gatti), United States and Spain (Federico Spagnoli). The present essay aims to summarize their interventions and analyzing them under the four most problematic perspectives: the legal foundations of the state of emergency, the relationship between the government and the parliament, the interactions between the different levels of government and, finally, the judicial controls on fundamental freedoms. In addition to the three interventions, we decided to present a contribution of two Brasilian academics (Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli and Hugo Frazão) on the response of Covid-19 Pandemic in Brasil.

This article analyses the Constitución Política del Estado Libre y Soberano de Guerrerocurrently in force, after its total revision, carried out in 2014. Thepaper recalls the constitutional eventsthat have affected the state of Guerrero since the first constitutional process,started in 1850, then it focuses on the nature and legal value of this State Constitution, as well as on its structure and general features.Afterward it takes into consideration the different sections of the Constitution: first of all, the fundamental values and principles on which the constitutional system is grounded, as well as the discipline of the rights and liberties that the system protects and guarantees. The essay focuses also on the form of government and the institutions of the State (in particular: Congreso, Government and judicial power).At the end of the investigation the author supports the perspective that the recent constitutional reform will contribute tothe consolidation of a democratic system that is still precarious, empowering the role of civil society in order to favor a real political responsibility, the recognition and protection of human rights and the end to every governmental abuse of power. Finally, the enforcement of the rule of law represents a fundamental aim to be pursued

The paper examines the evolution of the Mexican presidential system from a diachronic point of view. In the first part, thepaper explores the historical evolution of the Mexican presidential system (paragraphs no. 1, 2, 3 and 4). In the second part of the paper, it is analyzed the traditional form of government of the Mexican legal system (paragraphs no. 5,6,7 and 8). Finally, in the third and last part, the paper retraces the current and innovative evolutions of the Mexican system (paragraphs no. 9 and 10)

The paper examines the evolution of the Mexican presidential system from a diachronic point of view. In the first part, the paper explores the historical evolution of the Mexican presidential system (paragraphs no. 1, 2, 3 and 4). In the second part of the paper, it is analyzed the traditional form of government of the Mexican legal system (paragraphs no. 5, 6, 7 and 8). Finally, in the third and last part, the paper retraces the current and innovative evolutions of the Mexican system (paragraphs no. 9 and 10).

L'articolo introduce e sintetizza il contenuto dei contributi presentati al Convegno internazionale, di chiusura di un Prin 20010-2011, svoltosi a Pisa il 3-4 dicembre 2015, sul tema "Crisi economica, istituzioni democratiche e decisioni di bilancio".

The paper analyzes the development of the jurisprudence of the Italian Constitutional Court and of the Spanish Constitutional Court on the primary normative powers of the Government, trying to highlight the different stages of the constitutional control in this field. Both for the Decree Law and the Legislative Delegation have been taken into consideration: a) the first decisions with which the Constitutional Judges had declared its jurisdiction to control the proper use of such institutes; b) the decisions of the first half of 2000, with which it is made more "strict" the constitutional control; c) the decisions taken in the years of "crisis", from 2008 to the most recent judgments of 2016, in which important declarations of unconstitutionality took turns judgments more "reverential" towards the Executive's decisions.