Suchergebnisse

N° ISBN - 978-2-7380-1284-5 ; International audience ; Notre contribution s'inscrit dans les sciences pour l'action. Il s'agit de constituer un corps de connaissances permettant d'objectiver des processus d'innovation pour le développement durable et de gagner en intelligibilité sur les processus participatifs mis en oeuvre. Ce travail vise à permettre aux chercheurs de mieux situer leurs démarches participatives par rapport à celles des autres, leur permettant ainsi d'endosser une plus grande réflexivité sur leur travail. Nous avons testé notre grille d'analyse sur des recherches relatives au développement durable des systèmes d'élevage et des territoires, dans le cadre de l'UMR Métafort, afin d'en tirer une typologie des démarches participatives. Cette typologie apporte des éléments de positionnement pour les chercheurs qui s'engagent ou qui sont déjà engagés dans des démarches participatives. Nous pensons qu'elle peut être utile pour mieux définir les objectifs d'une telle démarche et aider à la conception de dispositifs innovants et adaptés à l'action. Cette réflexion sur les recherches participatives balise donc les chemins à parcourir, les pièges à éviter, les passages à ne pas manquer pour produire des projets innovants de développement durable. S'appuyant sur des expériences « vécues », elle est au coeur même de notre métier de chercheur, responsable des connaissances qu'il produit mais aussi de celles qu'il contribue à produire avec les acteurs. Dans les situations d'incertitude où nous sommes plongés sur les évolutions possibles des systèmes naturels et humains, il importe de trouver de nouvelles façons de résoudre des problèmes complexes.

International audience ; Group farming can be a powerful lever to face ongoing technical and societal transformations of agriculture, environmental challenges and to facilitate new farmers setting up. Despite expanding activities of farmers groups, new generation of farmers are sometimes reluctant to involve in groups which arose in a very different social, economic and political context, during the modernization period. Our research explores the following hypothesis: the difficulty to attract new generation of farmers is linked to different visions and aspirations of governance and work organization within the group. Younger generations of farmers express high expectations in terms of quality of work life. Farmers groups functioning is analyzed to understand how different types of work organization and governance impact quality of work life. The objective of this paper is to report on the analytical framework mainly built upon the definition of quality of work life and to illustrate what quality of work life means in a context of farmers groups.

International audience ; Group farming can be a powerful lever to face ongoing technical and societal transformations of agriculture, environmental challenges and to facilitate new farmers setting up. Despite expanding activities of farmers groups, new generation of farmers are sometimes reluctant to involve in groups which arose in a very different social, economic and political context, during the modernization period. Our research explores the following hypothesis: the difficulty to attract new generation of farmers is linked to different visions and aspirations of governance and work organization within the group. Younger generations of farmers express high expectations in terms of quality of work life. Farmers groups functioning is analyzed to understand how different types of work organization and governance impact quality of work life. The objective of this paper is to report on the analytical framework mainly built upon the definition of quality of work life and to illustrate what quality of work life means in a context of farmers groups.

International audience ; Group farming can be a powerful lever to face ongoing technical and societal transformations of agriculture, environmental challenges and to facilitate new farmers setting up. Despite expanding activities of farmers groups, new generation of farmers are sometimes reluctant to involve in groups which arose in a very different social, economic and political context, during the modernization period. Our research explores the following hypothesis: the difficulty to attract new generation of farmers is linked to different visions and aspirations of governance and work organization within the group. Younger generations of farmers express high expectations in terms of quality of work life. Farmers groups functioning is analyzed to understand how different types of work organization and governance impact quality of work life. The objective of this paper is to report on the analytical framework mainly built upon the definition of quality of work life and to illustrate what quality of work life means in a context of farmers groups.

International audience ; Group farming can be a powerful lever to face ongoing technical and societal transformations of agriculture, environmental challenges and to facilitate new farmers setting up. Despite expanding activities of farmers groups, new generation of farmers are sometimes reluctant to involve in groups which arose in a very different social, economic and political context, during the modernization period. Our research explores the following hypothesis: the difficulty to attract new generation of farmers is linked to different visions and aspirations of governance and work organization within the group. Younger generations of farmers express high expectations in terms of quality of work life. Farmers groups functioning is analyzed to understand how different types of work organization and governance impact quality of work life. The objective of this paper is to report on the analytical framework mainly built upon the definition of quality of work life and to illustrate what quality of work life means in a context of farmers groups.