Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Original Title Page -- Original Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- Preface -- Note on the Translation -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1: Saint-Simon's Life and Work -- 2: The Doctrine of Saint-Simon -- 3: The Influence of the Doctrine -- Notes to the Introduction -- Selected Writings -- Part I: Science and the Progress of the Human Mind (1802-13) -- Chapter 1: Letters from an Inhabitant of Geneva to His Contemporaries -- Chapter 2: Extract on Social Organisation -- Chapter 3: Introduction to the Scientific Studies of the 19th Century -- Chapter 4: Second Prospectus for a New Encyclopaedia -- Chapter 5: Memoir on the Science of Man -- Chapter 6: Study on Universal Gravitation -- Part II: Proposals for Post-War Reconstruction (1814-15) -- Chapter 7: The Reorganisation of European Society -- Chapter 8: On the Establishment of an Opposition Party -- Chapter 9: Letter to the Minister of the Interior -- Chapter 10: To All Englishmen and Frenchmen Who Are Zealous for the Public Good -- Part III: From the Government of Men to the Administration of Things (1817-20) -- Chapter 11: Declaration of Principles (L'Industrie) -- Chapter 12: Letters to an American (L'Industrie) -- Chapter 13: Letter to the Publicists -- Chapter 14: Views on Property and Legislation (L'Industrie) -- Chapter 15: On the Political History of Industry (L'Industrie) -- Chapter 16: The Political Interests of Industry -- Chapter 17: On M. Barthélemy's Proposal to the House of Peers (Le Politique) -- Chapter 18: Comparison between the National (Industrial) Party and the Anti-National Party (La Politique) -- Chapter 19: Prospectus for L'Organisateur -- Chapter 20: A Political Parable, First Extract from L'Organisateur -- Chapter 21: Sketch of the New Political System (L'Organisateur).

First Published in 1982. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Keith Taylor, Green MEP for the South East, delivered the closing speech at the International Aircraft Cabin Air Conference on Wednesday 20 September 2017. The conference, at Imperial College London, was hosted by The Global Cabin Air Quality Executive (GCAQE) in association with Pall Aerospace, Unite the Union, the British Professional Pilots union (PPU), and the University of Stirling. The twoday event brought together industry experts, cabin crew unions, and researchers to discuss the health concerns surrounding passenger and crew air supply contamination feared to be responsible for several deaths of pilots and crew and hundreds of incidents where pilots have fallen ill, sometimes at the controls. Frequent flyers and young children could also be affected. Earlier that week, EasyJet announced its plans to fit filters, manufactured by Pall Aerospace, to its cabin air systems in a move seen as an acknowledgment of the health concerns surrounding 'aerotoxic syndrome' – which has been long been denied by airlines. Keith Taylor is a member of both the European Parliament's Environment and Public Health and Transport and Tourism Committees. ; This paper is part of: "2017 International Aircraft Cabin Air Conference : Conference Proceedings". In: Journal of Health and Pollution, Vol. 9, No. 24 (Dec. 2019)

Third sector organizations are oftentimes seen as contributing to a robust civil society. Yet the dominant modes of third sector organizational governance often adhere to a unitary orientation. The over-reliance on unitary modes of governance introduces two challenges: first, organizational stakeholders are kept from utilizing participatory mechanisms that would enable them to act as societal intermediaries, and; second, these organizations may underperform due to the artificial separation of stakeholders from participating in governance. This paper addresses calls to widen our knowledge by translating theory into practice through a discussion about the efficacy of pluralistic governance. The co-operative enterprise in introduced to focus analyses on pluralist modes of stakeholder governance. A specific co-operative's governance structure and practice is introduced—Choctaw Electric Co-operative—through an archival analyses of secondary media accounts of a stakeholder-led reform initiative in rural Oklahoma. The Ostrom Design Principles—a diagnostic used to assess institutional robustness—are applied to demonstrate the shortsightedness of unitary governance, and highlight the potential benefits of pluralistic stakeholder engagement. Knowledge is widened in two ways: first, empirical analyses of co-operative enterprise may provide for significant insights and innovations in third sector governance, and; second proper systems of pluralistic governance exhibit enormous capacity to better orient the firm toward better serving the stakeholder base, improving performance and institutional robustness, while empowering stakeholders as societal intermediaries.

Third sector organizations are oftentimes seen as contributing to a robust civil society. Yet the dominant modes of third sector organizational governance often adhere to a unitary orientation. The over-reliance on unitary modes of governance introduces two challenges: first, organizational stakeholders are kept from utilizing participatory mechanisms that would enable them to act as societal intermediaries, and; second, these organizations may underperform due to the artificial separation of stakeholders from participating in governance. This paper addresses calls to widen our knowledge by translating theory into practice through a discussion about the efficacy of pluralistic governance. The co-operative enterprise in introduced to focus analyses on pluralist modes of stakeholder governance. A specific co-operative's governance structure and practice is introduced-Choctaw Electric Co-operative-through an archival analyses of secondary media accounts of a stakeholder-led reform initiative in rural Oklahoma. The Ostrom Design Principles-a diagnostic used to assess institutional robustness-are applied to demonstrate the shortsightedness of unitary governance, and highlight the potential benefits of pluralistic stakeholder engagement. Knowledge is widened in two ways: first, empirical analyses of co-operative enterprise may provide for significant insights and innovations in third sector governance, and; second proper systems of pluralistic governance exhibit enormous capacity to better orient the firm toward better serving the stakeholder base, improving performance and institutional robustness, while empowering stakeholders as societal intermediaries.

The UK government has recently consulted on proposals to prohibit access to health care for some asylum seekers. This discussion paper considers the wider ethical, moral, and political issues that may arise from this policy. In particular, it explores the relationship between immigration and health and examines the impact of forced migration on health inequalities. It will be argued that it is both unethical and iniquitous to use health policy as a means of enforcing immigration policy. Instead, the founding principle of the NHS of equal access on the basis of need should be borne in mind when considering how to meet the needs of this population.