Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
138 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Critical review: an interdisciplinary journal of politics and society, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 467-489
ISSN: 0891-3811
In: The national interest, Heft 103, S. 57-67
ISSN: 0884-9382
In: The national interest, Heft 103, S. 57-67
ISSN: 0884-9382
A review essay on books by 1) Ian Bremmer andNBPreston Keat, The Fat Tail: The Power of Political Knowledge for Strategic Investing (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 272 pp., $27.95, 2) Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, The Predictioneers Game: Using the Logic of Brazen Self-Interest to See and Shape the Future (New York: Random House, 2009), 272 pp., $27.00, & 3) George Friedman, The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century (New York: Doubleday, 2009), 272 pp., $25.95.
In: The national interest, Heft 103, S. 57-67
ISSN: 0884-9382
In: The national interest, Heft 103, S. 57-67
ISSN: 0884-9382
In: The national interest, Heft 103, S. 57-67
ISSN: 0884-9382
Since its original publication, Expert Political Judgment by New York Times bestselling author Philip Tetlock has established itself as a contemporary classic in the literature on evaluating expert opinion. etlock first discusses arguments about whether the world is too complex for people to find the tools to understand political phenomena, let alone predict the future. He evaluates predictions from experts in different fields, comparing them to predictions by well-informed laity or those based on simple extrapolation from current trends. He goes on to analyze which styles of thinking are more successful in forecasting. Classifying thinking styles using Isaiah Berlin's prototypes of the fox and the hedgehog, Tetlock contends that the fox--the thinker who knows many little things, draws from an eclectic array of traditions, and is better able to improvise in response to changing events--is more successful in predicting the future than the hedgehog, who knows one big thing, toils devotedly within one tradition, and imposes formulaic solutions on ill-defined problems. He notes a perversely inverse relationship between the best scientific indicators of good judgement and the qualities that the media most prizes in pundits--the single-minded determination required to prevail in ideological combat. Clearly written and impeccably researched, the book fills a huge void in the literature on evaluating expert opinion. It will appeal across many academic disciplines as well as to corporations seeking to develop standards for judging expert decision-making. Now with a new preface in which Tetlock discusses the latest research in the field, the book explores what constitutes good judgment in predicting future events and looks at why experts are often wrong in their forecasts
In: Administration & society, Band 43, Heft 6, S. 693-703
ISSN: 1552-3039
In: Administration & society, Band 43, Heft 6, S. 693-704
ISSN: 0095-3997
In: Critical review: a journal of politics and society, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 467-488
ISSN: 1933-8007
In: The national interest, Heft 110, S. 76-86
ISSN: 0884-9382
In: The national interest, Heft 110, S. 76-87
ISSN: 0884-9382
In: The national interest, Heft 110, S. 76-86
ISSN: 0884-9382